Search Results

1. [2013] NZEmpC 155 Clark v Idea Services Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...Regions of ISL and speak for themselves as follows: My findings … I have concluded that there are several behaviours of yours that have seriously undermined my (and IDEA’s) trust and confidence in you. The following are examples of how I formed my view: 1. Not following IDEA policies and procedures known to you – (Proposal for a change of living situation). As a result of your not following this policy, I received a number of complaints from Ministry of Health, Standards...

2. [2024] NZREADT 32 – JX v CAC2201 & Baker (13 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...email from an unnamed builder to “Ivan”.35 It contains a brief narrative of the builder’s involvement with the project. It references some of the defects raised by the purchaser, the repair work and the builder’s view of the purchaser’s claims. The email ends with the author saying he will meet the vendor, the project manager and the licensee on 15 September “to discuss a strategy of nipping this in the bud”, adding that the vendor and the licensee were seeking advice...

3. LCRO 95/2013 GI v JM (28 June 2017) [pdf, 255 KB]

   LCRO 95/2013 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GI Applicant AND JM Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr GI has applied to review a decision by the [City] Standards Committee [X] dated 19 March 2013, to take...

4. [2019] NZCAA 1 (18 January 2019) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...vehicle is properly forfeit due to it having a false odometer reading, and in addition the issue of whether any relief should be provided if it is. Issues The appellant’s position [7] The appellant did not initially challenge Customs’ claim that the odometer had an incorrect reading, the foundation for the appeal concerned the surrounding facts and a claim for relief. The key elements of the original position are: [7.1] The appellant imports used vehicles into New Zealand...

5. Murphy v ACC (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 71 [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 071 ACAR 214/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN GLEN MURPHY Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: J Miller for the Applicant F Becroft for the Corporation Hearing: On the papers Judgment: 22 April 2024 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER LE...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 78 SFWU v Rendezvous Hotels (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 39 KB]

   SFWU V RENDEZVOUS HOTELS (NZ) LTD AK 22 June 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2010] NZEMPC 78 ARC 71/10 IN THE MATTER OF application for interlocutory injunction to prevent lockouts BETWEEN SERVICE AND FOOD WORKERS UNION NGA RINGA TOTA INC Plaintiff AND RENDEZVOUS HOTELS (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 22 June 2010 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Timothy Oldfield, Counsel for Plaintiff Glenn Jones, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 22 June 20...

7. Carroll - Himatangi 7 Block (2017) 369 Aotea MB 107 (369 AOT 107) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20160003157 UNDER Section 231 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Himatangi 7 Block RITA RUTA CARROLL Applicant Hearing: 356 Aotea MB 214-224 dated 20 July 2016 358 Aotea MB 14-15 dated 30 August 2016 362 Aotea MB 98-111 dated 23 November 2016 (Heard at Palme...

8. INZ (Calder) v Horan [2019] NZIACDT 23 (23 April 2019) [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...NZIACDT 13. [2] Mr Horan was found to have communicated with Immigration New Zealand in an unprofessional way, withheld information from one of his clients and copied correspondence concerning his clients to people unconnected to the immigration applications. Such conduct was in breach of various provisions of the Code of Conduct 2014 (the Code). BACKGROUND [3] The background narrative leading to the complaint is set out in more detail in the Tribunal’s earlier decision....

9. About the Tribunal

   The Tribunal is an independent judicial body that hears claims relating to breaches of the: Human Rights Act 1993 Privacy Act 2020 Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 The Tribunal is administered by the Ministry of Justice and is completely separate from the Human Rights Commission, Privacy Commissioner, and Health and Disability Commissioner. The Chairperson and Deputy Chairpersons are appointed by the Governor-General on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice. Members of...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights

10. [2011] NZEmpC 17 Clarke v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...coming on to the plant and were stopping vehicles entering its premises and searching them with trained dogs. What happened with Mr Clarke has always been in dispute and so must be determined as a matter of evidence. [3] The company’s case, which formed the basis of its finding of serious misconduct and Mr Clarke’s dismissal, is that he refused to heed clear signals to stop and intimidated and endangered the safety of a supervisor engaged in the drug search exercise, Yvonne Llo...