Ministry of Justice

Search Results

1. Body Corporate 201036 and Unit Owners of Parnell Terraces [2010] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...PARNELL TERRACES ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Body Corporate 201036 as the representative of the owners of units in a complex known as Parnell Terraces has filed an application under section 16 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act) on 25 May 2010. Both the assessor appointed to complete the eligibility report and the chief executive concluded that the claim was not an eligible...

2. Wai 2800 2.5.1 [pdf, 106 KB]

   IN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL CONCERNING the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND remaining historical claims MEMORANDUM OF THE CHAIRPERSON APPOINTING A STANDING PANEL TO INQUIRE INTO REMAINING HISTORICAL CLAIMS IN THE SOUTH-WESTERN NORTH ISLAND, THE SOUTH ISLAND AND THE CHATHAM ISLANDS 6 September 2018 Wai 2800, #2.5.1 morganj Official 2 Tēnā koutou katoa Introduction 1. The purpose of this memorandum-directio...

3. Taihape inquiry hearing programme June 2017 [pdf, 355 KB]

   5 Appendix A Hearing Programme (as at June 2017) Week Kaupapa Likely dates Participants Site visit requests Research reports 1 Opening submissions and tribal landscape 6-10 Mar 2017 • Mōkai Pātea (Wai 385, 581, 588, 647, 1705, 1888) • Ngāti Hinemanu me Ngāti Paki (Wai 662, 1835, 1868) • Tony Walzl, Tribal landscape (#A12) • David Armstrong, Mōkai Pātea land, people and politics (#A49) • Peter McBurney, Ngati Hinemanu and Ngati Paki oral and tr...

4. CE v XQ LCRO 182 / 2010 (27 May 2011) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...182/2010 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN MS CQ of Hamilton Applicant AND MR XE of Hamilton Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] On 1 December 2009, the Applicant lodged a complaint with the Compl...

5. IT v OC Ltd [2024] NZDT 700 (15 November 2024) [pdf, 219 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 700 APPLICANT IT RESPONDENT OC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. IT purchased a new [car] from OC Ltd on 5 March 2024 at a cost of $88,490. One month later, OC Ltd had reduced the price on the same model to $81,900. IT claims the salesperson, IX, told him the price would not drop, and that it could i...

6. Rapatini v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 97 [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...with the decision of the District Court as being wrong in law may, with the leave of the District Court, appeal to the High Court. [3] In her submissions filed in support of her application, Ms Rapatini refers to her GP lodging an ACC 45 injury claim form for work related gradual process injury. [4] She also refers to s 28 which deals with work related personal injury and to s 30 to personal injury caused by work related gradual process. [5] She says that Judge Henare and J...

7. NC v KD & CD [2024] NZDT 535 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 535 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT KD and CD The Tribunal orders: KD and CD are to pay $351.50 to NC by 10 August 2024. Reasons Was the advertisement for the Cottage misleading? 1. NC booked KD and CD’s Cottage for four nights of accommodation. KD and CD’s advertisement stated that the Cottage was in a “peaceful rural settin...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 169 Kim v Thermosash Commercial Ltd [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...169 [14 December 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 169 ARC 54/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to strike out the claim BETWEEN WILSON KIM Plaintiff AND THERMOSASH COMMERCIAL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18 November 2011 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Plaintiff in person Jenni-Marie Trotman and Jo Douglas, counsel for defenda...

9. J. Kim v K. E. H. Kim [2016] NZIACDT 32 (22 June 2016) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...the complainant a copy of the Code of Conduct in the course of the client engagement process; [3.2] How she managed the application signed in blank. She accepts she did use that process. However, she says she referred the completed and pre-signed form to the complainant for approval before sending it to Immigration New Zealand; and, [3.3] She disputes the nature and extent of the advice she gave after the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully. [4] After making findings on the disp...

10. NM v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 393 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 165 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 393 APPLICANT NM RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. The dispute is about a [luxury brand] cashmere jumper NM purchased and whether pilling after 5 or 6 wears is sufficient to show it is not of acceptable quality. NM is seeking a refund of the $699.00 purchase price. 2....