12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 680 APPLICANT KY and LZ RESPONDENT SE The Tribunal orders: SE is to pay $3000.00 to KY and LZ on or before 26 January 2024. Reasons 1. KY and LZ purchased a [vehicle] from SE via [online platform] on 15 February 2023, paying him $3000.00 for the car. 2. Within a few weeks of SE delivering the car to them, [Car Rental Company] rep...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 555 APPLICANT DH RESPONDENT FI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In November 2023, DH loaned $2,600.00 bond money for a tenancy entered into by her son EI and his partner FI. 2. The tenancy only lasted for a short time, from 26 November 2023 to 11 February 2024. The landlord refunded the bond equally between...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 3 APPLICANT HW RESPONDENT BU Ltd The Tribunal orders: BU Ltd must pay HW $420.00 by 4pm on 8 February 2023. Reasons: 1. On 11 November 2022 the applicant was charged $420.00 after his car was towed from a carparking building. The applicant had purchased a monthly subscription to park in any unreserved bay the carparkin...
...respondents’ application for costs was dismissed in the Tribunal’s substantive decision, this determination is based on the remaining costs applications by the second respondent (Ojo Limited) and fourth respondent (Mineral Plaster Technologies Limited). Claims for Costs Application by Ojo Limited (Ojo) Ojo applied for costs against the claimants and the second respondents (Slaters) on the following grounds: • The claim by the Slaters that they relied on Ojo’s plans and specifi...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 430 BETWEEN BH APPLICANT AND YS RESPONDENT AND YSY SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 21 March 2013 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the case is struck out for lack of jurisdiction and referred to the Tenancy Tribunal This order is made in the absence of the first respondent and pursuant to section 42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 397 APPLICANT QL Ltd RESPONDENT JM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant claims that its [van] was damaged during a break in at his premises on or about the 28 July 2022. The applicant took his vehicle to [auto mechanic] for repair. [Auto mechanic] quoted $7,179....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 166 APPLICANT HN RESPONDENT UC RESPONDENT JS Ltd The Tribunal orders: UC and JS Ltd are to pay $5,500.00 to HN on or before Wednesday 21 June 2023. Reasons: 1. HN collects classic [cars]. He was restoring a [classic truck] and took it to UC for a quote to have it repainted. UC operates a business restoring vehicles....
...ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2019] NZEmpC 5 EMPC 310/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application as to scope of challenge BETWEEN SHANE HATCHER Plaintiff AND BURGESS CROWLEY CIVIL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: L Hansen, counsel for plaintiff T Wano, cou...
...Downs Syndrome. For a number of years until 1990, he suffered sexual abuse perpetrated by a family member. As a result of this he suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and requires specialist treatment and constant supervision. ACC accepted a claim in 1993 for compensation as a result of his post-traumatic stress disorder but repeatedly refused to approve and pay for more than 13 hours of attendant care. Mrs CT had undertaken the attendant care of RT without compensation....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 27 APPLICANT QS RESPONDENT DD Limited The Tribunal orders: Ownership of the 2005 [vehicle] revested in DD Ltd as of 9 November 2021; and DD Ltd is to pay $3869.75 to QS on or before 20 May 2022, plus, in the same timeframe, is to pay whatever weekly payments of $58.64 (to the finance company) and $13.79 (for breakd...