Search Results

1. Hunstanton v Cambourne and Chester LCRO 167 / 2009 (10 February 2010) [pdf, 71 KB]

   LCRO 167 / 2009 An application for review pursuant CONCERNING to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay Of Plenty Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Society BETWEEN MS HUNSTANTON Applicant AND MR CAMBORNE and MR CHESTER Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] Mrs Hunstanton complained to the...

2. [2006] NZEmpC CC 11/06 Michael Pearcy Investments Ltd v Miller [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...[1] The sole issue for decision by the Court in this case was the nature of the working relationship between the parties. [2] Between 2001 and 2004, the defendant’s services were provided to the plaintiff by another company. The defendant claimed that, from February 2004, she became an employee of the plaintiff. On this basis, she issued proceedings in the Employment Relations Authority seeking remedies arising out of the termination of the relationship in early 2005. [3] T...

3. AC v FV & HU LCRO 318/2012 (27 November 2014) [pdf, 50 KB]

   LCRO 318/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Standards Committee BETWEEN AC Applicants AND FV and HU Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr and Mrs AC have applied for a review of the determination by Standards Committee to take no further action in resp...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 207 Arohanui Hospice Service Trust v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...subject to the MECA and are now subject to the SECA: (a) those who have agreed to work on specified days of the week and on specified shifts on or across those days. These specified days and shifts are individual terms and conditions of the applicable part-time employees and set out in the letters of acceptance of employment; and (b) those who have agreed on individual terms and conditions of their employment (and as contained in their letters of acceptance of employment) to wo...

5. [2024] NZREADT 05 CAC v Pang (6 March 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...handwrote an initial for the vendor on each page. This included handwriting the initial against each of the “Client Acknowledgments”. In July and August 2021, Mr Pang did the same on the property checklist, the Pre-Auction Offer-Vendor’s Form, the Memorandum of Contract and on the Particulars and Conditions of Sale of Real Estate by Auction. The property was eventually withdrawn from sale. [6] As a result of his conduct on this transaction, the agency terminated Mr Pang’s...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 82 Goodfellow v Building Connexion Ltd t/a ITM Building Centre [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...[2] Mr Goodfellow believed he had been dismissed and that his dismissal was unjustifiable. He pursued a personal grievance to that effect. The Employment Relations Authority determined1 that Mr Goodfellow had not been dismissed and rejected his claims. Mr Goodfellow challenged that determination and the matter proceeded before me in a hearing de novo. 1 CA 170/09 9 October 2009 [3] The company owns and operates a buildin...

7. LCRO 25/2016 RZ v LB [pdf, 229 KB]

   LCRO 25/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RZ Applicant AND LB Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr RZ has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] to take no further ac...

8. Russell v CAC 10012 & Long [2012] NZREADT 16 [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...circumstances where the vendor, Doug Nottage (on behalf of his wife and himself), had given the following information to the Licensee in a 12 November 2007 letter from vendor to Licensee: “There is no reason at all why any new owner should not claim to have the other bit of unused paper road stopped. I should explain that we would have claimed the other piece of paper road too, but at the time the neighbours felt that they would like to keep that option open in case they subdivide....

9. Lett - Waipu 4A3E1 (2021) 431 Aotea MB 100 (431 AOT 100) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...A20200012643 WĀHANGA Under Section 164, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Waipu 4A3E1 and Kapakapa 5 Blocks I WAENGA I A Between IVOR TE KAHU STEVEN LETT Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 9 February 2021, 428 Aotea MB 181-184 9 March 2021, 428 Aotea MB 234-236 (Heard at Whanganui) Kanohi kitea: Appearances Ivor Lett, in person D Brown, for the Estate Raimapaha Rei Wha...

10. Williamson v Tangilanu [2012] NZIACDT 13 (28 March 2012) [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...before the Tribunal. The Complaint, and the Adviser’s Response [9] The key events and circumstances raised by the complaint were: [9.1] Mr Hakaumotu engaged Ms Tangilanu to apply for a visitor’s visa. In January 2009 Ms Tangilanu made the application for a fee of $150. The application was successful. [9.2] Mr Hakaumotu saw an advertisement in a newspaper, which said Ms Tangilanu would process residence applications for $600. He approached her, and was told that fee no longer...