12972 items matching your search terms
LCRO 215/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN KP Applicant AND VN Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] Mr KP has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee (the Committee) to take no furt...
85 Taitokerau MB 2 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20110002286 UNDER Section 18(1)(a), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An application for determination of ownership of a dwelling situated on MOTATAU 2 SECTION 49A4F BETWEEN JOSEPH TIPENE Applicant AND TANIA TIPENE Respondent Hearing: 10 October 2011 (20 Taitokerau MB 214-220) 13 March 2012 (39 Taitokerau MB 173-177) 11 May 2012 (...
...M Mortimer, on behalf of the Authority D Grove, on behalf of Mr Honey Date of Ruling: 26 November 2019 ____________________________________________________________________ RULING OF THE TRIBUNAL (Second respondent’s application to strike out appeals) ____________________________________________________________________ Introduction and procedural history [1] On 25 February 2011, Mr Dermot Nottingham (“Mr Nottingham”) and Property Bank Realtor Lt...
...receive a salary increase during the latter part of her employment; [2] The dismissal that Unitec acknowledges it effected having taken place in 2005, the new test of justification set out in s103A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 is applicable to the case. The Court must determine on an objective basis whether the employer’s actions, and how the employer acted, were what a fair and reasonable employer would have done in all the circumstances at the time the dismiss...
403 Aotea MB 276 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20170002368 UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ngātitara 26B Block BETWEEN JENNIFER RAUKURA JONES Applicant AND DIANE MARY KUMEA RATAHI ON BEHALF OF THE NGĀTITARA 26B TRUST Respondent Hearings: 20 June 2017, 372 Aotea MB 59-70 19 February 2019, 397 Aotea MB 46-52 (Heard at Te Hāwera) Appearances: J Jones in person P B...
...Held at: New Plymouth/Ngāmotu Appearances: M Buist for the Appellant T Gee for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 7 February 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Revocation of cover; claim for personal injury; suspension of entitlements - ss 20, 26, 65, 117, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 28 April 2022. The Reviewer dismissed a...
iBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2016] NZEnvC .1-~ '3 of an application for declarations under Part 12 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED (EDS) (ENV-2016-CHC-000071 ) Applicant MACKENZIE DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge LJ Newhook sitting alone under s279 of the Act at Christchurch on 16 December 2016 R Enright and M...
LCRO 181 /09 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 of the New Zealand Law Society BETWEEN MS SANDY of Auckland Applicant AND FAIYUM KHAN of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the Applicant and all third parties in this decision have been changed. The Respondent’s name has not be...
...it was not satisfied that the second respondents appreciated that the Sleepyhead contract might be terminated. [24] With regard to the additional signage charge, the committee concluded that most of the points relevant to the rent complaint were applicable to the claims regarding the purchasers’ lack of awareness that an additional signage fee was being claimed. The committee stated that the evidence did not prove that the second respondent should have known about the fee and info...
...of domestic predicate criminal activity and associated money laundering over 10 years. 8. Funding is required to ensure effective supervision of the new sectors, extend existing intelligence practices, and manage the increase in exemption applications from the sectors in Phase II. Funding is also required to ensure that additional AML/CFT investigations can be undertaken. Without investment in investigations we are unlikely to realise many of the early benefits of the changes. P...