Search Results

1. Vaerla v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 3 (29 January 2014) [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...basis for those bases of complaint was: [3.1] The adviser did not have any contact with the complainant. [3.2] A failure to inform the complainant that the adviser’s practice had moved to a new address. [3.3] The adviser (through a company) claimed credit for the issue of a work visa without performing the work. [3.4] The adviser failed to inform the complainant of progress with an application. [3.5] The adviser failed to refund fees. [4] The Registrar provided an outline of the...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 052 Rangitane O Tamaki v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAIZI NUI-A­ RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2019-WLG-000018) JOHN BENT (ENV-2019-WLG-000019) Appellants :MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Environment Judge BP Dwyer Environment Commissioner J A Hodges On the papers Mr D Allen and Ms E Bennett for the Tararna District Council (TDC) Mr N Jessen for the Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council (Regional Council) Mr A Warr...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 186 Housing New Zealand Corporation v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...should be considered when assessing a restricted discretionary activity; future possible implications of the Alternative Solution for resource consents; possible future plan changes to the Unitary Plan; the Council's process with respect to an application for resource consent for the Buchanan Street property; and the Hearing Panel Recommendations and reasons and the Council's Decision. [5] After careful consideration of all the material before us we conclude that we have...

4. Proactive-release-Sentencing_Reinstating-three-strikes_Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 788 KB]

   ...(Reinstating three strikes) Amendment Bill Date of issue: 06 August 2024 The following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 04. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it...

5. BORA State Sector and Crown Entities Reform Bill [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...Sector Act’). The amendment to one section in the Crown Entities Act includes a consequential technical amendment to two schedules in the New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000. 5. At present there are differing thresholds and powers applicable to investigations undertaken by the State Services Commission (‘the Commission’), depending upon whether the investigation is in relation to the core Public Service or the wider State services. This Bill puts in place a single in...

6. [2009] EBIIWU & ors v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [Chief Judge Colgan, AC 22A/09, 9 December 2009] [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...considered further written submissions from the parties on the question of compliance of the employee protection provision (EPP) with the statute. [2] I note that Mr Yukich purported to file a further brief of evidence of Mr Moengaroa in the form of a sworn affidavit dated 22 June 2009 but in the absence of any application for leave to admit that evidence or consent by the defendant to its filing, I have not taken it into account. [3] I regret the delay in delivering th...

7. Eichelbaum report - appendices [pdf, 540 KB]

   ...children and adults. A more recent finding, from the work of Ceci and his colleagues (e.g. Ceci & Bruck, 1996), is that the impact of such questioning may spill over into a child's subsequent spontaneous statements, such that the child may claim that a non-existent event occurred and even include spurious supportive detail to back up this claim. There is usually no question of the child's intending to mislead; the statements are made with evident sincerity, but appear to be bas...

8. G v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0056 [pdf, 874 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEI-0056-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN A G Applicant AND EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION First Respondent AND VERO INSURANCE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Second Respondent Appearances: K Robinson, M Hills and T Sauni for Applicant N Walker and E Light for First Respondent A Durrant for Second Respondent FINAL DECISION OF P R COGSWELL...

9. Dick - Wairau Block XII Section 7B2 and others (2021) 72 Te Waipounamu MB 147 (72 TWP 147) [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...Section 7B2; Wairau Block XII Section 7B1A Section 2; Wairau Block XII Section 7B No 1B Block; Wairau Block XII Section 7A2; Wairau Block XII Section 7A3 I WAENGA I A Between PETER ALAN DICK and KAREN GATES DICK Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearings 22 January 2020, 63 Te Waipounamu MB 214 9 July 2020, 65 Te Waipounamu MB 121-132 (Heard at Blenheim and Christchurch) Kanohi kitea: Appearances C McKendry for the Applicants D Dew...

10. CAC20003 v Sue [2015] NZREADT 87 [pdf, 180 KB]

    ...referred to at paragraph two, the clients contacted the defendant by telephone, text message and email. The defendant did not respond to the clients’ attempts to communicate with him about the rental monies owed to them. On 1 March 2013, the clients requested that the defendant contact them or deposit the outstanding amount into their bank account by 7 March 2013. The defendant failed to respond. 4. On 8 March 2013, the clients terminated the property management agreement. 5. T...