Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12924 items matching your search terms

  1. LZ v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 174 (22 May 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 174 APPLICANT LZ RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by LZ against I Ltd is proved. I Ltd is to pay LZ the sum of $5,100.00 by 5:00 pm on 05 June 2023. 2. I Ltd does not owe I Ltd for the value of the promotional gift cards up to $1000.00. Reasons 1. In July 2022, LZ purchased a [redacted] fishing d...

  2. Rafiq v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2013] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 83 KB]

    ...defendant is an interference with the privacy of the plaintiff. Without these pre-requisites the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction under s 85 of the Act to grant a remedy. [8] The statement of claim in HRRT037/2011 alleges multiple breaches of information privacy Principles 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 11. The statement of claim in HRRT038/2011 alleges multiple breaches of information privacy Principles 1 to 11 while the statement of 3 claim in HRRT039/2011 alleges multiple breaches o...

  3. KL v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 92 (1 February 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 92 APPLICANT KL RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In about November 2021, KL bought a mattress from D Ltd. The mattress was described as “medium”, as opposed to the other descriptions for that type of mattress, “soft” and “firm”. KL developed a pain in his shoulder in about May 2022, an...

  4. Kropelnicki v Wellington City Council (Strike-Out) [2021] NZHRRT 30 [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...filing of the amended statement of claim was sought. Mr Fraser also sought leave to withdraw on the basis that legal aid had been declined and that Mr Kropelnicki, who was by that time in Costa Rica, refused to provide the information Mr Fraser had requested from him. [13] By Minute dated 13 September 2019 the Tribunal granted Mr Fraser leave to withdraw as counsel. New timetabling directions were made with Mr Kropelnicki now to 3 file his amended statement of claim by 13 Dec...

  5. DA v YB [2023] NZDT 685 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 166 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 685 APPLICANT DA RESPONDENT YB The Tribunal orders: YB is to pay $705.00 to DA on or before 31 January 2024; and Once the payment is made, DA is to make the scooter available for collection by YB within four weeks of payment. Reasons 1. The applicant purchased a new scooter from the respondent via [online platform] at a cost...

  6. [2013] NZEmpC 146 Strawberry Tree Ltd v Tuckett & Parr [pdf, 65 KB]

    ...statement of claim but, as soon as registry staff became aware of it, they advised Mr Kavanagh that service could not properly be effected on overseas parties without leave of the Court. 2 On 20 December 2012, Mr Kavanagh was told that such an application was required and sent copies of the relevant regulations and forms. [7] In the meantime, Mr Kavanagh had apparently posted a copy of the amended statement of claim to the defendants. They responded to this by sending a statement...

  7. Apostolakis v Gilbert (Decision) [2018] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 290 KB]

    ...Apostolakis and Mr Gilbert were given notice these proceedings would be heard at the Tribunals Unit, Ministry of Justice, Level 1, 86 Customhouse Quay, Wellington on 9 and 10 March 2017. [8.2] On 13 February 2017 Mrs Apostolakis filed an adjournment application based on a number of grounds. No mention was made of ill-health. That application was dismissed by the Chairperson by Minute dated 15 February 2017. 3 [8.3] At 1:20pm on 8 March 2017 ie the afternoon before the hearing,...

  8. DQ & FD v BS [2021] NZDT 1655 (2 November 2021) [pdf, 209 KB]

    ...DQ’s by the other tenants. DQ and FD filed a claim for the amount of bond not refunded. 2. This is a claim for a breach of the agreement between the tenants which is alleged to have resulted in a loss of two weeks rent, that is $430.00, to the Applicants. The Respondents counterclaimed, in effect, for a declaration that they were not liable to the Applicants pursuant to section 10(1)(b) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. Both parties claim a refund of their costs, namely the f...

  9. C Ltd v E Ltd [2022] NZDT 259 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 96 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 259 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out for lack of jurisdiction. Notes Mr E of E Ltd was driving past an X service station in August 2022 when he noticed a man water-blasting close to the edge of the canopy roof of the service station. He made a phone call to advise the appr...

  10. [2010] NZEmpC 148 Auckland DHB & 20 Other DHB Named in the attached Schedule v NZ Resident Doctors Assoc [pdf, 56 KB]

    ...bargaining for collective agreement (1) This section applies for the purposes of section 32(1)(e). (2) A request by a union or an employer to the other for information must— (a) be in writing; and (b) specify the nature of the information requested in sufficient detail to enable the information to be identified; and (c) specify the claim or the response to a claim in respect of which information to support or substantiate the claim or the response is requested; and (d) s...