Search Results

1. X Ltd v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 284 (25 July 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...at the time they were stolen, K Ltd is not required to compensate X Ltd for breach of the contract, because I have not found that any breach has occurred. Referee: M Wilson Date: 25 July 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. BI & SI v BA [2023] NZDT 142 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...the cars that the Applicants understood they were purchasing. 3. At the first hearing I adjourned to allow the Applicants further time to obtain documents from the Police file. At the second hearing the Applicants told me that they had further information which they wanted the Tribunal to consider, I allowed the Applicants further time to send in these documents, which they did. I confirm that I have considered all the evidence filed by the Applicants in determining this matter. 4....

3. DN v NS [2024] NZDT 336 (23 May 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...claim. NS has not been in contact with the Tribunal. I attempted to call NS but was unable to reach him. NS was posted the notice of hearing in April 2024 and a reminder was emailed to him prior to the hearing. I am satisfied that NS was properly informed of the claim, the hearing date and time, and the matter could proceed in his absence. 4. The issues to be resolved are: a. Did NS cause damage to DN’s car? b. If so, is DN entitled to claim $3,252.34? Did NS cause damage to DN�...

4. Boyd v Legacy Church and Legacy Housing (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...from Ms Boyd. [11] On 9 January 2023 the Tribunal received an email from Mr Tennet advising he was having difficulties contacting Ms Boyd, that she had also not maintained contact (although Mr Tennet noted that may not be the fault of Ms Boyd) and requesting until 27 January 2023 to file an updating email. [12] There has been no further correspondence from Mr Tennet. JURISDICTION TO STRIKE OUT [13] Pursuant to HRA, s 115A (which applies to these proceedings under s 111 of the P...

5. LCRO 24/2020 TN v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (30 November 2020) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...of that process, and the Committee’s subsequent resumption of its process in April 2019. The Committee’s decision records that in the meantime: On 24 August 2018, Judge VH released a copy of the 23 November 2017 letter following an earlier request by [the Committee]. Mr TN did not take the opportunity offered by the Committee to file further submissions after the own motion inquiry resumed, and the decision recording that there had been unsatisfactory conduct on his part was is...

6. Roberts v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2022] NZACC 208 [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...that Mr Roberts had been employed by New Zealand Forest Service Nursery from “?Aug 1986” for three weeks. This certificate described him as being unemployed, and with “TAPS Salvation Army Cambridge? From Nov 1986 to Accident”.1 An ACC Information Consent Form dated 9 June 1987, signed by Mr Roberts’ mother, described him as unemployed. [5] On 30 January 2001, Mr Colin Higgins noted in a letter that he was a used car dealer and did not employ full-time staff. However...

7. BC v ACC (Interest on backdated weekly compensation) [2024] NZACC 67 [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...third scenario outlined in Miller. The Court finds the date as to when all necessary information was received enabling the Corporation to make decision, is 11 February 2021, having regard to the facts that follow. [23] The Corporation received the request for the payment of weekly compensation in May 2019. It follows, the “all information” date cannot be earlier than May 2019, because that is the date when the claim for weekly compensation was lodged. The claim for weekly comp...

8. NM & B Ltd v J Ltd & RJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1662 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...backs onto [Street]. In early 2018, work started on building a school on an adjacent block of land on the other side of the lane. The construction included earthworks and drainage using heavy machinery. 5. In late August 2018, work started on reforming [Street]. The initial work involved using an excavator to remove the existing concrete driveway. The excavator was used to break up the concrete for removal by truck. 6. The roadway was formed by placing six layers of road met...

9. QS v DD Ltd [2022] NZDT 27 (20 April 2022) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...problems with the electric windows not opening and a bent aerial. On 3 August 2021 the vehicle broke down and was not driveable so was towed to a relative’s house nearby – that problem turned out to be transmission failure. QS completed a DD claim form the following day. She received confirmation of receipt of the claim form from DD on 11 August 2022 and in that email DD advised her to have the vehicle assessed by any MTA Approved mechanic under the mechanical breakdown insurance sh...

10. TT v M Ltd & I Ltd [2025] NZDT 137 (28 February 2025) [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...company). This includes reimbursement of all fees and interest, and compensation for stress, hurt and humiliation. 4. The issues to be determined are: a) Is I Ltd liable to pay compensation for the incorrect mention of a partner on the application form? b) Was the full initial disclosure made? If not, did the continuing disclosures (credit card statements) cover the required information for an initial disclosure? c) Did M Ltd breach legal obligations to the customer by delay in closi...