12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 276 APPLICANT TO FIRST RESPONDENT ZY & KX SECOND RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: ZY & KX and M Ltd jointly and severally liable to pay directly to TO the sum of $745.00 on or before 22 August 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 813 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT QC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 3 July 2024 at approximately 7pm, the Applicant was driving along [Road 1] and making a right hand turn into [Road 2]. Where [Road 2] enters [Road 1], [Road 2] is controlled by a give way sign. 2. When the Applicant turned into [Road 2], the...
Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 3 May 2024 Ref: OIA 111168 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) on 29 February 2024, to the Ministry of Health for information about policies related to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. On 5 April 2024 the Ministry of Health transferred the following part of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 138 APPLICANT in claim, Respondent in counterclaim UN RESPONDENT in claim, Applicant in counterclaim BF Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. UN is to pay $127.50 to BF Ltd before 6 October 2022. Reasons 1. On 4 May 2022 UN parked in a carpark managed by BF Ltd. UN was aware from signs d...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1404 APPLICANT XC RESPONDENT MG Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: MG Limited is to pay the sum of $1877.38 directly to XC on or before 22 May 2019. Reasons 1. Mr C purchased a light aircraft from MG Ltd (‘MG’). A written quotation was accepted in October 2017 and Mr C took possession of the aircraft...
.................................................................................................................................. 3 Grounds for Review ................................................................................................................. 4 APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW ................................................................................................ 5 Applications ...............................................................................................
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 571 APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TE and her late husband engaged H Ltd to complete the framing of their house in 2018. 2. The code of compliance was not granted because further work was needed to get the house up to standard. Contractors were hired to complete this work....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 636 APPLICANT LK APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT JK Ltd The Tribunal orders: The Respondent is to pay the Applicants $5,300.00 by no later than 4th October 2024. Reasons 1. The Applicants state that they made a payment following the receipt of an invoice from, what they thought, was the Respondent. The Applicants made a deposit...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 220 APPLICANT LC RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. Any applicant to the Tribunal has the task of establishing the legal and factual elements of its claim to the required evidential standard. That standard is the balance of probabilities which means what is more likely than not. 2. LC says:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 136 APPLICANT I Ltd 1ST RESPONDENT D Ltd 2ND RESPONDENT X Ltd 3RD RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 22 November 2021, I Ltd sent a parcel to its customer. The parcel was scanned into the D Ltd’s [Metropolitan facility] on 23 November 2021. 2. Due to Covid-19 lockdowns, th...