Search Results

1. NM & B Ltd v J Ltd & RJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1662 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...backs onto [Street]. In early 2018, work started on building a school on an adjacent block of land on the other side of the lane. The construction included earthworks and drainage using heavy machinery. 5. In late August 2018, work started on reforming [Street]. The initial work involved using an excavator to remove the existing concrete driveway. The excavator was used to break up the concrete for removal by truck. 6. The roadway was formed by placing six layers of road met...

2. FV v UE Ltd [2022] NZDT 140 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...confusion in the communications between the parties was due to the issue over proof of purchase. Conclusion 13. For these reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: K Rendall Date: 1 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. N Ltd v ES [2024] NZDT 74 (17 January 2024) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...photographs in support of this. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 24. NB responded that the ‘re-grown’ poplars will not take the same shape as the original poplars. They will not have a strong main trunk, they will be more ‘bushy’ in form, they will not grow to the same height, and they will be more vulnerable to broken branches and wind damage. 25. I accept that argument. Simply allowing the poplars to grow back will not return NB to the position that he was in be...

4. [2025] NZEmpC 159 McCormack v Reserve Bank of New Zealand [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...4(1A) of the Act and principle 6 of the Privacy Act 2020.6 Specifically, it requested information regarding Mr McCormack that was produced or otherwise sent or received, involving a number of the RBNZ individuals. Mr McCormack made further requests for information from the RBNZ post termination. [41] On 26 September 2024 Ms Rowe wrote to Mr McCormack following the 11 September 2024 meeting to address his concerns around his protected disclosures and explain why his allegations...

5. Pio v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 010 [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...2015, the Corporation accepted cover for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, with an accident date of 21 March 2014 (when he first sought treatment). [10] On 9 September 2015, Mr Pio had an initial client interview with the Corporation. He informed the Corporation that he developed carpal tunnel gradually while working in a mussel factory. He left the factory and started a job with Pelorus Logging in Blenheim, where he was going well for approximately twelve months when symptoms...

6. HL & NL v FL [2022] NZDT 280 (7 November 2022) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...discussed at the second hearing. SP will collect these items on 30 October 2022. 126. FL is to pay NL $1,125.00. 127. The counterclaim is dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 7 November 2022 Page 10 of 10 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

7. AR v ZI ZIZ Ltd [2014] NZDT 574 (26 May 2014) [pdf, 24 KB]

   ...no part of that amount has been awarded, I will address that issue no further. Issues [6] The issues to determine are: (a) Who were the contracting parties? (b) What were the terms of the original contract? (c) Was there a second contract formed after the applicant’s former employer went into liquidation? (d) Did ZI provide his service with reasonable care and skill, that is, did he meet the statutory guarantees provided for in the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993?...

8. Boyd v Legacy Church and Legacy Housing (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...from Ms Boyd. [11] On 9 January 2023 the Tribunal received an email from Mr Tennet advising he was having difficulties contacting Ms Boyd, that she had also not maintained contact (although Mr Tennet noted that may not be the fault of Ms Boyd) and requesting until 27 January 2023 to file an updating email. [12] There has been no further correspondence from Mr Tennet. JURISDICTION TO STRIKE OUT [13] Pursuant to HRA, s 115A (which applies to these proceedings under s 111 of the P...

9. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...relapse of her condition and received payments from November 2011 to April 2014 (of $14,164 to $14,816 per month). [9] A condition of the policy, to enable continuation of the payments to Ms Fendall, required her to submit monthly declaration forms, in which she was required to disclose whether she had undertaken any work activities and/or received any income during the period since the previous claim payment. She was also required to declare that her statements were “… true...

10. Form 25A Fixed Fees G [pdf, 290 KB]

    Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 25a Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedule G Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type ✓ High Court Court location Details of claim Date activity/fixed fe...