Search Results

1. Cook v Department of Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...failure to comply with the 20-working daytime limit must be treated as a decision of the agency to refuse the IPP6 request. [3.3] The personal information request went unanswered until the Privacy Commissioner’s involvement in August 2019, with the requested information being provided on 28 August 2019. [4] The Department has admitted there has been an interference with Ms Cook’s privacy and agrees that a declaration of interference with privacy should be made in the circumstan...

2. ABY v ZYF [2013] NZDT 125 (17 September 2013) [pdf, 47 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 125 BETWEEN ABY APPLICANT AND ZYF Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 September 2013 Referee: Referee Hannan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZYF Ltd, pay directly to the Applicant, ABY, the sum of $610.00 on or before 17 August 2011. The Respondent is entitled to retain possession of the Acer computer in question. Facts [1] The Applicant...

3. EX v IO [2022] NZDT 10 (2 March 2022) [pdf, 203 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 10 APPLICANT EX RESPONDENT IO The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. EX gifted a scooter to his son DX for Christmas 2020. He claims that the scooter is now being held by DX’s mother, IO, and claims $479.99 from her being the cost of the scooter. 2. The issues to be decided are: a. Who owns th...

4. LCRO 13/2021 ZW v HN (25 November 2021) [pdf, 250 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 197 Ref: LCRO 13/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN ZW Applicant AND HN Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr ZW has a...

5. BJ Ltd v YQ Ltd YQY [2013] NZDT 416 (11 November 2013) [pdf, 69 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 416 BETWEEN BJ LIMITED APPLICANT AND YQ LIMITED RESPONDENT AND YQY SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 11 November 2013 Referee: Referee McKinstry ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim for non liability by the applicant is dismissed. Facts [1] The applicant had been receiving telecommunication services from the respondent for about 5 years. On 15 J...

6. FV v UE Ltd [2022] NZDT 140 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 140 APPLICANT FV RESPONDENT UE Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. FV purchased a tumble dryer in 2021, which she then provided to the tenants in her rental property. In August 2021 it developed a fault with the heating. FV approached UE Ltd, as that was where she recalled having purchased...

7. UC v QG RG [2023] NZDT 120 (8 March 2023) [pdf, 202 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 120 APPLICANT UC RESPONDENT QG and RG The Tribunal orders: QG is to pay $15,000.00 to UC on or before Friday 24 March 2023. Reasons: 1. UC is a registered breeder of [Dog Breed]. He said he imported into New Zealand a [Dog Breed] with a sought after and rare gene [redacted]. He entered into a written contract with...

8. GE v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 442 (23 August 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 442 APPLICANT GE RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. GE bought a T Ltd TV in December 2022 and in May 2023 it stopped working (it would not turn on). T Ltd’s representatives diagnosed it over the phone as requiring a replacement part and advised GE that they could repair it i...

9. KS v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 540 (10 July 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 540 APPLICANT KS RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks repayment of a towing fee paid in December 2023 to release her vehicle. The parties agree the essential fac...

10. TE & DJ Ltd v EX [2022] NZDT 122 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 193 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 122 APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT EX APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) DJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: Both claims are dismissed. Reason 1. TE and EX share a boundary. TE claims EX cut a communications cable causing damage to his home automation system including the electric gate control and lighting. EX sa...