Search Results

1. KO v TC [2023] NZDT 713 (17 December 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...Is KO entitled to $160.00 as claimed, or to any other sum? Has TC breached the contract by not supplying goods sold to KO? 5. When individuals agree to buy and sell goods, they make a contract. Contract law generally requires parties to perform the promises they make to each other unless there is a valid legal reason not to do so. 6. I find there is insufficient evidence to prove a breach of contract. 7. KO has clearly stated that certain key items were not delivered to him....

2. [2025] NZLVT 026 – Casata Limited v Minister for Land Information (17 June 2025) [pdf, 332 KB]

   CASATA LIMITED V MINISTER FOR LAND INFORMATION IN THE LAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL AT WELLINGTON I TE TARAIPŪNARA WĀRIU WHENUA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision [2025] NZLVT 026 IN THE MATTER OF a claim for compensation under s 84 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN CASATA LIMITED (ENV-2018-WLG-121) Claimant AND MINISTER FOR LAND INFORMATION Respondent Tribunal: Judge J A Smith Hearing: On the papers Last case event: 7 May 2025 Counsel: K J Dobbs and L M...

3. Parohinog v Yellow Pages Group Ltd (Strike-Out Application No 2) [2015] NZHRRT 14 [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...Criminal Matters”, detailed an alleged stalking incident at a parking building in Hamilton, revisited her difficulties with the Family Court, spoke of her problems in the High Court regarding her dispute with her aunt, Diwa Feck and concluded with a request the Tribunal inspect the photographs attached to the application: 13. Please your Honour, see the attached photos of the Organised Crime of Covert Electronic Assault Stalking and Surveillance New Zealand, Stalking, Gangstalking, Har...

4. QS v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 703 (15 August 2024) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 4 of 5 pump failure in October, but as stated in the earlier findings, that is not the sort of event for which T Ltd would be able to establish a timeframe/identify a responsible guest. 24. I cannot see any basis from the information and evidence presented on which T Ltd would have liability to pay for or contribute to pump replacement and/or pump repairs. Partial refund of property management fees 25. Given that the above claims have not succeed...

5. AODT Court Operational Policy update 2023 v3.01. [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...Treatment Court (AODT) Legal Aid Services Operational policy July 2023 2 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully ex...

6. ET and JT v F Ltd [2021] NZDT 1639 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...within a couple of days. On 24 January, BS emailed again, saying that the submission would be submitted by 31 January. By this time, ET and JT had lost confidence in the ability of F Ltd to complete the work in accordance with its promises, and informed F Ltd on 28 January 2020 that they were cancelling the contract. [6] ET and JT paid two invoices, totalling $10,420.73, sent by F Ltd as work went on. Subsequently, they received an invoice for $18,828.38 from F Ltd, dated 27 January 20...

7. FT v BF Ltd [2023] NZDT 793 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...$13,643.10 by the date stated in the order. The counter claim by BF Ltd for damages is dismissed, and the claim for the removal of the veranda is struck out. Referee: K Rendall Date: 20 December 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. [2022] NZACC 140 – Beauchamp v ACC (15 July 2022) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...“failure to issue decisions” following the SRNA report of 24 May 2020. On 8 October 2020, the Corporation’s issued a substantive decision on Ms Beauchamp’s matters. A week later, nine of the review applications were withdrawn. Ms Koloni requested costs in respect of 12 review applications lodged. On 28 October 2020, the Corporation awarded Ms Beauchamp costs totalling $166.35. [24] The Corporation, in its costs decision, purported to act in terms of section 148(3) of t...

9. MQ v HQ [2021] NZDT 1659 (14 July 2021) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...reasons, the claim for compensation sought by MQ is not granted but a work order and alternative money and access orders are made on the terms stated. Referee: Malthus - DTR Date: 14 July 2021 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

10. OJ & RJ v BX & KX [2023] NZDT 527 (29 October 2023) [pdf, 120 KB]

    ...discussing the erection of a fence along part of the boundary between the properties with OJ’s partner. While BX and KX thought that negotiations were amicable it became apparent this was not the case. OJ’s partner advised that they required a formal notice to be served on them under s.10 of the Fencing Act 1978 (the FA). BX and KX did this and were responded to with a cross notice. Further notices were exchanged but without agreement being reached as to the fencing work required to be...