Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 27 - Alves v ACC (3 March 2022) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 22 February 2022 Held at: Dunedin/Ōtepoti Appearances: The appellant represented himself C Hlavac for the respondent Judgment: 3 March 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs - s 148, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 5 March 2021 and relates to costs awarded to Mr Alves in respect of that review hearing. Background...

2. ADF v ZWU Ltd [2013] NZDT 180 (19 June 2013) [pdf, 53 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 180 BETWEEN ADF APPLICANT AND ZWU Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 19 June 2013 Referee: Referee Edison ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is transferred to the District Court pursuant to s 36(2) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988. Facts [1] ADF claims that her former accountant, ZWU Ltd, was negligent in filing a GST return for a tax re...

3. OQ v QM & ors [2024] NZDT 539 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 166 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 539 APPLICANT OQ FIRST RESPONDENT QM and KM SECOND RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The applicant’s claim and the second respondent’s cross- claim are dismissed. Reasons Application 1. The applicant has applied for an order that the resp...

4. P Ltd v V Ltd [2024] NZDT 377 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 377 APPLICANT P Ltd RESPONDENT V Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. [1] P Ltd, represented by directors UI and OD, claim from V Ltd, represented by director CJ, $1090.20 for drainage inspection camera work that was provided by P Ltd. It is not disputed that the work was done, but V Ltd considers the circumstances are such that it...

5. MX v BO & KO [2021] NZDT 1630 (13 July 2021) [pdf, 141 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1630 APPLICANT MX RESPONDENT BO SECOND RESPONDENT KO The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by MX against BO and KO to have the trees on the O’s property removed is struck out. 2. The claim by MX against BO and KO for the costs of having roots removed and for clearing leaves and tree litter from the drain besid...

6. KE v OT & NT [2023] NZDT 594 (4 December 2023) [pdf, 249 KB]

   Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 594 APPLICANT KE RESPONDENT OT and NT The Tribunal orders: Please also email Application struck out. Reasons 1. This was a claim filed by applicant, as executor of the estate of his late elderly father Q (known as “Q”). 2. On behalf of the estate, the applican...

7. DD v B Ltd [2022] NZDT 258 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 258 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay $700.00 to DD on or before 30 January 2023. Reasons 1. DD paid $2700.00 to B Ltd (‘B LTD’) in April 2018 as 50% part-payment for installation of a balustrade. Work was to commence in about 6 weeks. However, DD then requested a further quota...

8. Marsden [2012] NZWHT Auckland 2 [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6698: KYM IRIS MARSDEN ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Ms Marsden is the owner of a leaky home. On 27 July 2011 she filed an application for an assessor’s report with the Department of Building and Housing. Although the assessor concluded her claim was eligible the chief executive concluded that the claim was not an eligible claim because it was not filed within...

9. QS v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 24 (4 February 2024) [pdf, 217 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 24 APPLICANT QS RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim for a declaration of non-liability is denied, so QS is to pay the sum of $1,006.25 to B Ltd in full, on or before 5pm Monday 11 March 2024. Reasons: 1. QS contracted B Ltd in July 2023 due to a dripping leak in the guest toilet at her [suburb] residence and ask...

10. Cook v Department of Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...failure to comply with the 20-working daytime limit must be treated as a decision of the agency to refuse the IPP6 request. [3.3] The personal information request went unanswered until the Privacy Commissioner’s involvement in August 2019, with the requested information being provided on 28 August 2019. [4] The Department has admitted there has been an interference with Ms Cook’s privacy and agrees that a declaration of interference with privacy should be made in the circumstan...