12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 442 APPLICANT GE RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. GE bought a T Ltd TV in December 2022 and in May 2023 it stopped working (it would not turn on). T Ltd’s representatives diagnosed it over the phone as requiring a replacement part and advised GE that they could repair it i...
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 197 Ref: LCRO 13/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN ZW Applicant AND HN Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr ZW has a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 120 APPLICANT HK Ltd RESPONDENT MO Ltd The Tribunal orders: MO Ltd is to pay $20,700.00 to HK Ltd on or before 31 August 2022; and HK Ltd is to deliver the Type B shelves to MO Ltd within one week of the above payment being made. Reasons 1. MO Ltd engaged HK Ltd to supply custom-made shelves – a price of $...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 122 APPLICANT TE RESPONDENT EX APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) DJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: Both claims are dismissed. Reason 1. TE and EX share a boundary. TE claims EX cut a communications cable causing damage to his home automation system including the electric gate control and lighting. EX sa...
...Objection noted that the applicant was due to appear next to answer the charges before the Waitakere District Court on 26 May 2014. [8] On 22 April 2014 the applicant wrote to the Authority. In her letter she said “I wish to lodge an appeal and request a hearing to have this matter adjudicated”. The Authority took this to mean that the applicant was requesting a hearing in person before the Authority pursuant to s.26(1) of the Act. [9] In a Minute dated 26 April 2014 the Authori...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 298 APPLICANT OH RESPONDENT LT APPLICANT'S INSURER U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. All parties appeared at the hearing. Is the respondent liable for the collision of 7 December 2022? [2] The applicant claims that on the abov...
...proceedings any sooner than they did, or at least they brought it within a reasonable time of first being able to. Interest will therefore be awarded for the entire period from 28 February 2020 to today, that amount being $439.51. 10. While the applicants’ claim also requests an order that interest will continue to accrue until payment is received, section 20(1) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 specifies that the Tribunal may order interest to be paid under the Interest on Money Clai...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 322 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay directly to EI the sum of $4,145.75 on or before Thursday, 16 May 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The applicant seeks half the cost of reinstating the back boundary fence after a fire at the respondent’s property and half the cost of a new boundary fence on the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 783 APPLICANT E Ltd RESPONDENT FN The Tribunal orders: FN is to pay E Ltd the amount of $1,167.00 on or before Friday 12 January 2024. Reasons: 1. The claim was heard on 18 December 2023 at 2pm. FN did not attend the hearing although five attempts to reach him by telephone were made. FN had earlier in the day indicated to the...
...defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF SUBSTANTIVE DECISION: 21 December 2020 DATE OF DECISION OF COSTS: 24 November 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS1 [1] The Tribunal by decision in Greer v Corrections (Strike-Out Application) 2020 NZHRRT 49 struck-out Mr Greer’s claim. Mr Greer had failed to file any evidence and the claim was struck out as an abuse of process. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Greer v Corrections (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 44.]...