12515 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 125 BETWEEN ABY APPLICANT AND ZYF Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 September 2013 Referee: Referee Hannan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZYF Ltd, pay directly to the Applicant, ABY, the sum of $610.00 on or before 17 August 2011. The Respondent is entitled to retain possession of the Acer computer in question. Facts [1] The Applicant...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1630 APPLICANT MX RESPONDENT BO SECOND RESPONDENT KO The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by MX against BO and KO to have the trees on the O’s property removed is struck out. 2. The claim by MX against BO and KO for the costs of having roots removed and for clearing leaves and tree litter from the drain besid...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 180 BETWEEN ADF APPLICANT AND ZWU Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 19 June 2013 Referee: Referee Edison ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is transferred to the District Court pursuant to s 36(2) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988. Facts [1] ADF claims that her former accountant, ZWU Ltd, was negligent in filing a GST return for a tax re...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1417 APPLICANT IN Ltd RESPONDENT JT The Tribunal hereby orders, on the claim and counter-claim: JT is to pay $962.40 to IN Ltd on or before 2 September 2020; and JT is declared not liable for any debt collection charges incurred by IN Ltd. Reasons 1. JT stayed at IN Ltd's "DI Home & Hospital" from 21 Aug...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 10 APPLICANT EX RESPONDENT IO The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. EX gifted a scooter to his son DX for Christmas 2020. He claims that the scooter is now being held by DX’s mother, IO, and claims $479.99 from her being the cost of the scooter. 2. The issues to be decided are: a. Who owns th...
...Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6698: KYM IRIS MARSDEN ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Ms Marsden is the owner of a leaky home. On 27 July 2011 she filed an application for an assessor’s report with the Department of Building and Housing. Although the assessor concluded her claim was eligible the chief executive concluded that the claim was not an eligible claim because it was not filed within...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 416 BETWEEN BJ LIMITED APPLICANT AND YQ LIMITED RESPONDENT AND YQY SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 11 November 2013 Referee: Referee McKinstry ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim for non liability by the applicant is dismissed. Facts [1] The applicant had been receiving telecommunication services from the respondent for about 5 years. On 15 J...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 540 APPLICANT KS RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant seeks repayment of a towing fee paid in December 2023 to release her vehicle. The parties agree the essential fac...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 140 APPLICANT FV RESPONDENT UE Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. FV purchased a tumble dryer in 2021, which she then provided to the tenants in her rental property. In August 2021 it developed a fault with the heating. FV approached UE Ltd, as that was where she recalled having purchased...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 120 APPLICANT UC RESPONDENT QG and RG The Tribunal orders: QG is to pay $15,000.00 to UC on or before Friday 24 March 2023. Reasons: 1. UC is a registered breeder of [Dog Breed]. He said he imported into New Zealand a [Dog Breed] with a sought after and rare gene [redacted]. He entered into a written contract with...