Search Results

1. TE & TT v ST [2023] NZDT 54 (26 January 2023).pdf [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...District Court [2023] NZDT 54 APPLICANT TE APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT ST The Tribunal orders: The claim by TE and TT against ST is struck out for want of jurisdiction. Reasons 1. The parents of TE and TT (the applicants) died “intestate”. The applicants now bring a claim against ST who is their sibling (the respondent) for funeral costs for their mother in the sum of $11,870.00. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Does the Disputes Tribuna...

2. ET v MC & DC [2022] NZDT 119 (5 August 2022) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court - [2022] NZDT 119 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT MC SECOND RESPONDENT DC The Tribunal orders: The claim by ET is struck out. With respect to the counterclaim by MC and DC, ET is to pay $560.00 to MC and DC by the 5th September 2022. Reasons The claim by ET 1. ET claims from MC and DC for a contribution of $1248.00 tow...

3. OQ v QM & ors [2024] NZDT 539 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 166 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 539 APPLICANT OQ FIRST RESPONDENT QM and KM SECOND RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The applicant’s claim and the second respondent’s cross- claim are dismissed. Reasons Application 1. The applicant has applied for an order that the resp...

4. [2022] NZACC 27 - Alves v ACC (3 March 2022) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 22 February 2022 Held at: Dunedin/Ōtepoti Appearances: The appellant represented himself C Hlavac for the respondent Judgment: 3 March 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for costs - s 148, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 5 March 2021 and relates to costs awarded to Mr Alves in respect of that review hearing. Background...

5. P Ltd v V Ltd [2024] NZDT 377 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 377 APPLICANT P Ltd RESPONDENT V Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. [1] P Ltd, represented by directors UI and OD, claim from V Ltd, represented by director CJ, $1090.20 for drainage inspection camera work that was provided by P Ltd. It is not disputed that the work was done, but V Ltd considers the circumstances are such that it...

6. The Māori Trustee v Greening – Pirikotahi 9A2, 9B1, 9B2A and 9B2C2 (2013) 60 Taitokerau MB 78 (60 TTK 78) [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...Judgment: 06 June 2013 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J AMBLER 60 Taitokerau MB 79 Introduction [1] This decision addresses whether the second respondent, Rio Greening, is entitled to pursue a counter-claim against the Māori Trustee after the Māori Trustee has withdrawn his application. Background [2] The Māori Trustee brought two applications before the Court. Although the two applications proceeded in tandem, this decision is onl...

7. KE v OT & NT [2023] NZDT 594 (4 December 2023) [pdf, 249 KB]

   Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 594 APPLICANT KE RESPONDENT OT and NT The Tribunal orders: Please also email Application struck out. Reasons 1. This was a claim filed by applicant, as executor of the estate of his late elderly father Q (known as “Q”). 2. On behalf of the estate, the applican...

8. DD v B Ltd [2022] NZDT 258 (20 December 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 258 APPLICANT DD RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay $700.00 to DD on or before 30 January 2023. Reasons 1. DD paid $2700.00 to B Ltd (‘B LTD’) in April 2018 as 50% part-payment for installation of a balustrade. Work was to commence in about 6 weeks. However, DD then requested a further quota...

9. QS v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 24 (4 February 2024) [pdf, 217 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 24 APPLICANT QS RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim for a declaration of non-liability is denied, so QS is to pay the sum of $1,006.25 to B Ltd in full, on or before 5pm Monday 11 March 2024. Reasons: 1. QS contracted B Ltd in July 2023 due to a dripping leak in the guest toilet at her [suburb] residence and ask...

10. Cook v Department of Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...failure to comply with the 20-working daytime limit must be treated as a decision of the agency to refuse the IPP6 request. [3.3] The personal information request went unanswered until the Privacy Commissioner’s involvement in August 2019, with the requested information being provided on 28 August 2019. [4] The Department has admitted there has been an interference with Ms Cook’s privacy and agrees that a declaration of interference with privacy should be made in the circumstan...