Search Results

1. IC v QX LCRO 243 / 2010 (17 August 2011) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...LCRO 243 /2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 5 BETWEEN MR IC Of [North Island] Applicant AND MR QX Of [North Island] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] Mr IC (the Applicant) filed complaints against Mr QX (the Respondent) which were...

2. SD & TD & RD v EL & LL [2021] NZDT 1569 (15 July 2021) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...SD APPLICANT TD APPLICANT RD RESPONDENT EL SECOND RESPONDENT LL The Tribunal orders: The claim made by TD, RD and SD against EL and LL is dismissed. Reasons: 1. RD became engaged to LL in January 2021. The applicants incurred engagement expenses in an amount of $12,224.75. The applicants claim that EL agreed to meet half the engagement expenses. Mr EL and Mr LL dispute that such an agreement was made. The applicants claim $6,112.37 from the respo...

3. QS v SQ [2023] NZDT 56 (21 February 2023) [pdf, 187 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 56 QS SQ The Tribunal orders: SQ is to pay QS $790.00 on or before 21 March 2023. Reasons 1. QS responded to an advertisement placed on TradeMe by SQ for a room in a house to rent. He met with SQ on 27 November 2022 and discussed the property. They travelled to the property for QS to look at it and they agreed tha

4. JY v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 64 (17 July 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 64 APPLICANT JY RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicant took his vehicle to the respondent for a warrant of fitness (WOF) inspection on 23 November 2022. T...

5. IM v KE [2024] NZDT 301 (8 May 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 301 APPLICANT IM RESPONDENT KE APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) G Ltd The Tribunal orders: KE is to pay $250.00 to IM on or before 31 May 2024. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. On or about 14 December 2023, IM drove into the carpark of [café]. IM says as she pulled up, a large dog started jumping up at her...

6. JT v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 227 (24 February 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...$75.00. She emailed Q Ltd suspecting the letter was a scam and was informed of her breach with photographic evidence. 2. Q Ltd subsequently have continued to charge administration/ recovery fees of $75.00 every two weeks. At the time of filing the claim, JT had paid Q Ltd $95.00 and had requests for payment from Q Ltd for $325.00. JT seeks an order that she is not liable to Q Ltd for $325.00. 3. Q Ltd did not appear at the hearing, nor were there any submissions filed in response to the...

7. SO v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 450 (20 May 2024) [pdf, 174 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 450 APPLICANT SO RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: C Ltd is to pay the sum of $2,100.00 to SO on or before Monday 10 June 2024. Reasons: 1. In June and July 2021, SO (the consumer) made a couple of online purchases of electronic goods on layby from C Ltd (the supplier). His first purchase was a box of electronic goods for $...

8. BI v U Ltd [2022] NZDT 142 (5 August 2022) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 142 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BI had a policy with [ING]. The policy insured a Mercedes Benz owned by BI. The policy was underwritten by U Ltd. BI says his car was stolen and lodged a claim with U Ltd in March 2016 which they declined. BI is claiming $17,13...

9. What happens at a hearing

   On this page: Hearing location Who should attend the hearing Who can give evidence Evidence that can be presented What happens at the hearing What you should bring to the hearing Requests for adjournments Hearings are held in public and usually take 1 to 2 hours, depending on how complex the case is. The Tribunal also has the power to hear cases on the papers. If all parties agree to this process then that means you do not have to attend a formal hearing in a courtroom and the Tribunal c...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal >
   3. What happens next

10. IHC New Zealand v Ministry of Education (Non-Party Access No. 2) [2014] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 51 KB]

    ...Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms F Joychild QC for Plaintiff Ms M Coleman and Mr SJ Humphrey for First and Second Defendants DATE OF DECISION: 16 May 2014 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL GRANTING NON-PARTY ACCESS TO STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND STATEMENT OF REPLY Background [1] These proceedings were filed on 27 September 2012. For reasons set out in the Minutes dated 22 November 2012, 15 February 2013, 24 May 2013, 28 June 2013 and 4 July 2013, little progress has be...