Search Results

1. Greer v Police (Strike-Out Application) [2022] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...Hickey MZM, Member Ms L Ashworth, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr A Greer in person Mr R S May and Mr S B McCusker for defendant DATE OF HEARING: On the papers DATE OF DECISION: 21 December 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING-OUT CLAIM1 [1] This decision relates to a claim filed by Mr Greer in the Human Rights Review Tribunal alleging that the Commissioner of Police (Police) failed to respond to an information privacy request he made in 2014 in a timely manner...

2. Steele v Community Leisure Centre Ltd (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...advised Mr Steele by telephone that his WAC membership was revoked. Later that day, Mr Steele met Mr Mullins and another WAC manager, Mr Scott Linklater, at the WAC. His membership was terminated at this meeting. [8] Mr Steele subsequently made a request to the WAC under the Privacy Act 1993 for a copy of the incident report. [9] On 4 July 2016, Mr Steele complained to the HRC alleging sexual harassment and naming the WAC as the respondent to his complaint. The HRC did not accept th...

3. Starik v Auckland Council [2016] NZWHT Auckland 5 [pdf, 491 KB]

   ...texture-coated fibre-cement clad areas and replacement of damaged timber and internal items was required. [14] By the time this claim was in adjudication Mr Light no longer had a contract as a WHRS assessor. In November 2015, Peninsula Homes made a request to engage Mr Light as its expert witness. The Tribunal advised that as Mr Light was no longer under contract to WHRS he may perform this role. [15] Mr Wiemann was subsequently appointed as the WHRS assessor. Mr Wiemann...

4. Duty Lawyer Policy July 2017 [pdf, 460 KB]

   Duty lawyer service Operational policy July 2017 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. Pu

5. Duty Lawyer Policy v2.3b [pdf, 549 KB]

   Duty lawyer service Operational policy July 2017 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. Pu

6. Duty lawyer policy [pdf, 549 KB]

   Duty lawyer service Operational policy April 2017 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. P

7. UQD Ltd v KN [2020] NZDT 1415 (30 September 2020) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...similar age van with the additional components of LPG, campervan fitout and towbar (or even one of these things except for perhaps a towbar). For the fuel system to be LPG rather than petrol is pertinent because NH explains that he had intended to perform a hydrogen conversion on the vehicle which can be done from LPG but not from a petrol fuel system. He also preferred the fuel efficiency of LPG. 10. This means that the most straight-forward and cost-effective way for UQD Ltd to be r...

8. BL & KL v QT [2024] NZDT 206 (12 April 2024) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...with reasonable care and skill, it a tradesman-like manner and to a tradesman’s standard. 16. As this was a “cash” job, there is no contract documentation of the scope of work, the price or the terms, except for the roof, therefore the information available to the Tribunal is limited and much of it is in dispute. The burden of proof is on the Applicants. 17. There is extensive evidence that the workmanship was defective, with overspray and paint drips on many interior and ex...

9. NT v GD Ltd [2022] NZDT 177 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...the applicant had booked his flights, there were several instances where the airlines changed flight times and the respondent failed to notify him of significant changes. Instead, these notifications came directly from the airline. b. Incorrect information was given to the applicant by an agent who was no longer working for the respondent, causing confusion and stress. This was especially the case regarding flights that had been booked but not proceeded with as the applicant and his fami...

10. B Ltd v OQ [2024] NZDT 107 (11 January 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...[11] Thus, although I accept that B Ltd did the work for which it claims, I consider it is not entitled to payment from OQ, and the claim is dismissed. Referee: C Hawes Date: 11 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...