13020 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1597 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application against L Ltd is struck out. Reasons 1. The hearing on 9 June 2021 was a continuation of an earlier hearing (6 May 2021) which was adjourned part-heard as insufficient time was allowed for me to adequately determine the issues. 2. At t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 49 APPLICANT GT Limited RESPONDENT SX Trading As: TTE SECOND RESPONDENT TX Trading As: TTE THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT EN Limited Trading as TTE The Tribunal orders: 1. SX and EN Limited, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $1,100.00 to GT Limited on or before Thursday 10...
...http://www.justice.govt.nz/about/lawyers-and-service-providers/legal-aid-lawyers/legal-aid-provider-manuals/grants-handbook/ the estimated cost. The provider will need to submit an application for amendment to grant on the appropriate legal aid form available below. Criminal: • Form 51 Civil/Family: • Form 52 These forms can be found at the following link: www.justice.govt.nz/about/lawyers-and-service- providers/legal-aid-lawyers/forms/pdf-legal-aid- forms/ Clai...
1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 69 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6754: CHRISTOPHER ADAMS JOSEPH WARD: 3435 State Highway 5, Te Pohue, Napier ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Christopher Adams is the owner of a leaky home. On 25 August 2011 he filed an application for an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 536 APPLICANT SO RESPONDENT TH The Tribunal orders: The claim by SO is struck out. Reasons 1. SO is a taxi driver. She drives for HU Ltd who is the applicant in [file number redacted], which was heard together with SO’s claim. HU Ltd is part of HT Society Limited. TH is the Chairman of the Board of HT. 2. SO is unha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 47 APPLICANT KX NX RESPONDENT GV LtdGV LtdGV Ltd The Tribunal orders: NX is added as an applicant to the application with the consent of the parties. GV LtdGV Ltd is to pay KX and NX the sum of $210.00 within 21 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. In or about May 2021, NX entered into a contrac
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 14 APPLICANT SX RESPONDENT R Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT M Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT INSURER E Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. SX owned a rental property at [address] which was property managed by M Ltd, a franchisee of R Ltd. SX alleges M Ltd acted negligently on her behalf bec...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) RESULT OF APPLICATION FOR REHEARING [2023] NZDT 654 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim SE RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against D Ltd Result of application for rehearing: 1. A rehearing is refused. 2. The order of 17 August 2023 stands. 3. The stay of proceedings granted on 1 September 2023 has lapsed. Reasons: 1. On 17...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 721 APPLICANT E Ltd RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd is to pay E Ltd $30,000 on or before 5.00pm 28 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In 2020, E Ltd purchased timber from O Ltd, who supplied H4 treated timber for decks and stairs that were being built in his property development. In June 2021, during the building of the...
The person who makes the application or claim is called the applicant. A person who has a claim made against them is called the respondent. When the Copyright Tribunal gets the application We’ll contact the applicant to confirm we’ve received their application. We’ll also let the respondent know an application has been filed against them. When the chairperson decides the case is ready for a pre-hearing telephone conference, we’ll contact the people involved (the parties) and arrange a ti...