12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 455 APPLICANT IU RESPONDENT ND The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 5 November 2022, the Respondent leased a show-jumping horse from the Applicant. The Applicant was pregnant and she wished for her horse to continue training and competing. There was no lease payment due, ho...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court - [2022] NZDT 108 APPLICANT K RESPONDENT OQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: K’s claim against OQ Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant owns a property near the property at [address] which the respondent manages as a rental agent. On 7 February 2022, there was a party at [address] during which the fence on the applicant’s...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 197 APPLICANT NA RESPONDENT ZT SECOND RESPONDENT AM THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT NI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NA and the respondents are neighbours. The respondents had complained about the privet trees on NA’s property, as some of their household suffered from allerg...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 561 APPLICANT BK RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The dispute concerns the amount refunded by N Ltd on a sixteen-week nutrition and exercise programme called [programme] for which BK paid $3,800.00. BK started the programme on 17 August 2023, but requested to be released from the programme aft...
...disclosure; the second is an application for dismissal for want of prosecution brought by Alliance Group Ltd (Alliance). Both applications have been on foot for some time. Common to each has been a problem of extensive delay in advancing disclosure requests as raised by Ms van Kleef. What this case is about [2] Before turning to the particular issues, it is necessary to repeat what I said about the background of this case in my first interlocutory judgment. [3] The proceedings a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 60 APPLICANT MM RESPONDENT NF Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 13 July 2021, MM booked her wedding reception at the NF Ltd venue for 11 December 2021, for a minimum of 120 guests. On 9 November, the NF Ltd venue advised that owing to Government Covid restrictions in place, the maximum number...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1597 APPLICANT MT RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application against L Ltd is struck out. Reasons 1. The hearing on 9 June 2021 was a continuation of an earlier hearing (6 May 2021) which was adjourned part-heard as insufficient time was allowed for me to adequately determine the issues. 2. At t...
...http://www.justice.govt.nz/about/lawyers-and-service-providers/legal-aid-lawyers/legal-aid-provider-manuals/grants-handbook/ the estimated cost. The provider will need to submit an application for amendment to grant on the appropriate legal aid form available below. Criminal: • Form 51 Civil/Family: • Form 52 These forms can be found at the following link: www.justice.govt.nz/about/lawyers-and-service- providers/legal-aid-lawyers/forms/pdf-legal-aid- forms/ Clai...
...INTRODUCTION [1] This case is about a request for access to personal information held by an agency, a request repeated on multiple occasions. In the four month period from 14 February 2013 to 15 June 2013 (the period covered by the amended statement of claim dated 15 January 2016 (ASoC)) no fewer than twelve access requests were allegedly made by the plaintiff. The legal consequences of those requests are addressed in this decision. Background to the requests [2] Dr Lisa Turner is a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 49 APPLICANT GT Limited RESPONDENT SX Trading As: TTE SECOND RESPONDENT TX Trading As: TTE THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT EN Limited Trading as TTE The Tribunal orders: 1. SX and EN Limited, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $1,100.00 to GT Limited on or before Thursday 10...