Search Results

1. Recommendations Recap 2024 Q2 [pdf, 884 KB]

   ...NZCorC 63 (5 April 2024) ............................................................................... 38 iii Ure [2024] NZCorC 113 (11 June 2024) ................................................................................ 39 Medical Care ............................................................................................................................ 40 Mantell [2024] NZCorC 90 (15 May 2024) .........................................................................

2. Tweeddale v Pearson [pdf, 405 KB]

   ...and enter the base plate if it finds a break in the plastic wrap that extends up from the concrete foundation. [39] The assessor noted that the plastic was wrapped up beneath the Hardibacker approximately 300 mm, just enough to offer some protection from water trapped in the lower cladding. The plaster was found to be pushed in and around the Hardibacker base preventing drainage. [40] The assessor examined the plaster. He found that it exceeded the recommended maximum thi...

3. MFAT report Human Rights in NZ 2010 [pdf, 4.7 MB]

   ...978-0-478-34985-0 – Printed 978-0-478-34988-7 – PDF 1 Te Kähui Tika Tangata is the korowai or cloak of the Human Rights Commission. Te kähui embraces those who gather together under the kaupapa of human rights and symbolises both their protective role and the Commission’s role in promoting them. Tika tangata refers to our human rights and responsibilities, suggesting the highest imperatives of respect and conduct. The design of the Commission’s logo derives from t...

4. [2022] NZIACDT 20 - XZ v Liu (10 August 2022) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...advised the complainant that he could return. The complainant returned to New Zealand on 6 November 2020 and resumed work on 9 November. Decision of the Tribunal [8] The Tribunal found that Mr Liu was not diligent and did not exercise due care in advising the complainant that he could not return to New Zealand. It was regarded as an honest mistake and a momentary lapse in concentration. However, a reasonable, prudent and diligent practitioner would not have given such advice....

5. Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v De'Ath [2019] NZIACDT 1 (10 Jan 2019) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...applicants.1 Each of the applicants had engaged Mr De’Ath’s company to obtain employment in New Zealand and then to pursue an immigration application on their behalf. Once the applicant arrived in the country, the company provided pastoral care services. [3] Mr De’Ath’s business model had relied on unlicensed people in the Philippines dealing directly with the applicants on immigration matters. It appeared to the Tribunal that those people were from a different Philippi...

6. LD v Review of prosecutorial decision LCRO 15/2015 (15 June 2015) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...be considered by the Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal” (the Tribunal). [2] A confidential report was made to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS) pursuant to rule 2.8 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the rules). The Committee considered the report appeared to indicate that there may have been misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct on Mr LD’s part, and commenced an investigation of its own motion pursuant to s 130(c) of...

7. [2022] NZIACDT 22 - SU v Murthy (Sanctions) (29 August 2022) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...considerable time on their matters. Decision of the Tribunal [13] The Tribunal found: (1) The late filing of the assessment application was a breach of Ms Murthy’s obligation in cl 1 of the Code to conduct her work with diligence and due care. (2) Ms Murthy did not have a written contract for the work visa application, in breach of cl 18(a). (3) Ms Murthy failed to confirm in writing to the complainant the termination of her services in relation to the work visa, in bre...

8. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report December 2024 [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   ...Justice Indicators Summary Report. December 2024. Wellington: Ministry of Justice. This document is available at https://www.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/research-data/justice- statistics/youth-justice-indicators/ Disclaimer While all care and diligence has been taken in processing, analysing, and extracting data and information for this publication, the Ministry of Justice gives no warranty that it is error free and will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by the...

9. Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Councils [pdf, 504 KB]

   ...The decision-maker is required to have regard to the Sports Fish and Game Management Plans to the extent that they have a bearing on the resource management issues of the Region (section 66(2)(c)(i) of the Act), and to have particular regard to the protection of the habitat of trout (section 7); 3 7.4. The provisions the subject of this appeal do not adequately protect the habitat requirements of the Region’s sports fisheries, or provide for the compulsory value of ecosys...

10. Strengthening the family justice system - Q and A [pdf, 330 KB]

    ...A review is undertaken of PTS and that this takes place every three years. • PTS be kept as a free service. • Introduction of Family Dispute Resolution (FDR) • FDR should be available at the most appropriate time for parents, caregivers and their whānau, whether or not an application to court has been made. • Where an application to court has been made but FDR not undertaken, the matter be referred to FDR, unless good reasons are given not to (rebuttable...