Search Results

1. CAC20005 v Cui [2015] NZREADT 23 [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...contribute about $3,000 towards costs.” The Submissions for the Authority on Penalty [5] Mr Clancy observed that it is well established that decisions of professional disciplinary tribunals should emphasise the maintenance of high standards and the protection of the public through specific and general deterrence; and, while this may result in orders having a punitive effect, this is not their purpose – refer Z v CAC [2009] 1 NZLR 1; CAC v Walker [2011] NZREADT 4. [6] The Authori...

2. BORA Coroners Amendment Bill [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...to help to prevent deaths. In addition, the Chief Coroner is able to grant an exemption from restricting publication of these details, and the Chief Coroner’s decision will be subject to High Court review. There is also a justifiable interest in protecting the privacy of persons connected with the deceased. Accordingly, we conclude the limited restraints on publication, as set out in the Bill, represent a justifiable limit upon freedom of expression. Reappointment of coroners/relief...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 32 ZUW v WFW [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...request was made because the Authority ordered permanent non-publication of the defendant’s name or any identifying information. An issue arose about whether a consequential non-publication order is necessary to preserve the Authority’s order protecting the defendant. Ms Foley submitted it is necessary to do that. That was because of a combination of where they all live, the easy identification of the director and ease with which connections could be made between the director...

4. Berry & Ors as Trustees of the Burns Berry Trust v Lay [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...Waterproofing of the decks; • Balustrades around the decks (and some parapet work); • Flat roofs; • Bathrooms. 4.3 The Owners have provided in evidence the details of how these leaks were caused in each of the areas. I will need to carefully review the evidence when analysing each potential area of leak later in this Determination. I will not get immersed in these details at this point, but simply provide an overview of the claims. 4.4 The remedial work has been...

5. Toilolo v Letalu [2014] NZIACDT 52 (15 April 2014) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...her liability for deportation and paid fees of $800 to him. There was no written agreement. [5.3] The adviser had to file the appeal within 42 days of the complainant becoming unlawful in New Zealand. Unless lodged in that time, the Immigration and Protection Tribunal could not accept the appeal due to a statutory limitation. [5.4] The adviser requested a copy of the complainant’s record from Immigration New Zealand on 1 June 2011, and he received it on 1 July 2011. 3 [...

6. Unnikrishnan v Goldsmith [2017] NZIACDT 22 (29 September 2017) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...appropriate standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned. 9 [38] The statutory purpose is achieved by considering at least four factors that materially bear upon maintaining appropriate standards of conduct: [38.1] Protecting clients: section 3 of the Act states that “[t]he purpose of this Act is to promote and protect the interests of consumers receiving immigration advice ...” [38.2] Demanding minimum standards of conduct: Dentice v Valuers Re...

7. Connors - Rakautaua 1B2A2 (2007) 180 Aotea MB 242 (180 AOT 242) [pdf, 825 KB]

   ...severance. [27] As to the exchange, the dissenting owners, as mentioned have agreed to receive the exchange land even though they do not consent to the overall scheme that is proposed. It is obviously an essential element of the agreement. Having carefully considered the evidence before the Court and the conditions as set out in sections 310-312 of the Act, I am satisfied that the exchange complies with those provisions. Change of status [28] Regarding the change of status applica...

8. Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) v Drever [2016] NZREADT 72 [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...Act”) against the Defendant, Mr Drever. On 8 August 2016 the Committee was given leave to amend the charge to misconduct under s 73(c) of the Act (reckless contraventions of the Act), the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2009 (“the 2009 Rules”), and the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012 (“the 2012 Rules”).1 On 8 August 2016, Mr Drever admitted the amended charge. Throughout this decision, referenc...

9. Turuki! Turuki! Moving Together [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...Our approach focuses on ensuring our collective security through an enduring system which uplifts people, strengthens our communities and relationships, ensures we are all responsible for justice and accountable for our actions, and models more care and compassion for all. This report sets a direction for such change. We are not advocating for minor measures but rather we are laying out a pathway to transformation. Our recommendations will make all New Zealanders safer, and the justice...

10. LCRO 36/2018 AA v SM (19 December 2018) [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...out those instructions? 6 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 7 Deliu v Connell [2016] NZHC 361, [2016] NZAR 475 at [2]. 8 (b) In preparing Mrs RS’ will, did Mr SM protect and promote Mrs RS’ interests, and act competently? Independence (c) Did Mr SM act for Ms LO whilst performing his duties as executor and trustee of Mrs RS’ estate? If so, when acting for Ms LO was he independent and free f...