Search Results

1. 2019 Youth Court Protocol [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...If leave to publish is granted, the permission will usually be unconditional. On some occasions the leave to publish may be subject to specified conditions. 7. It is only in rare cases that leave to publish will be refused, such as in order to protect witnesses who may be later giving evidence in trials in the District/High Court or to ensure that a fair trial is not prejudiced. 8. Leave of the Court is also required to publish or report from a Youth Court decision published on th...

2. 2017 Youth Court Media Protocol [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...If leave to publish is granted, the permission will usually be unconditional. On some occasions the leave to publish may be subject to specified conditions. 7. It is only in rare cases that leave to publish will be refused, such as in order to protect witnesses who may be later giving evidence in trials in the District/High Court or to ensure that a fair trial is not prejudiced. 8. It is recognised that it would be inappropriate and contrary to the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1...

3. Education and Training Amendment Bill (No 2) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Act Section 21 - unreasonable search and seizure 6. Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right of everyone to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure, whether of the person, property, correspondence or otherwise. The right protects several values including personal privacy, dignity, and property.1 A request for information or documents constitutes a search for the purposes of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act.2 7. Clause 57 amends the principal Act by inserting news...

4. Media Protocol 2017 - Youth Courts [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...If leave to publish is granted, the permission will usually be unconditional. On some occasions the leave to publish may be subject to specified conditions. 7. It is only in rare cases that leave to publish will be refused, such as in order to protect witnesses who may be later giving evidence in trials in the District/High Court or to ensure that a fair trial is not prejudiced. 8. It is recognised that it would be inappropriate and contrary to the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1...

5. VU v AP LCRO 277/2011 (5 June 2013) [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...the matter had not been looked at. His complaint was that Mr AP had acted on behalf of himself and his wife without their authority or knowledge, and there was also the concern that Mr AP had breached Rule 11.1 of the Rules of Conduct and Client Care.1 [7] Rule 11 deals with proper professional practice. Rule 11.1 states that a lawyer must not engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive anyone on any aspect of the lawyer’s practice. [8...

6. AAD v ZZW LTD [2009] NZDT 9 (9 June 2009) [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...was appointed by both parties to act, and signed an agreement relating to how the costs would be shared. Being a professional appointment, the law would imply into the contract a requirement that AAD carry out her role with reasonable skill and care. [6] The Sharemilkers Agreements Act 1937 also applies. The Schedule to that Act sets out the minimum requirements of any Sharemilking Agreement that must be included to protect the interests of the parties. The Sharemilking Agreement...

7. Tuitupou v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 51 (15 April 2014) [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...work, but she told her clients she had made the request to Immigration New Zealand. She also made up an account of what had happened to the request. [2.3] The adviser’s licence expired. She had still done nothing. She did not take any steps to protect her clients’ interests, or refund fees. [3] The adviser has not challenged the Statement of Complaint, which set out these grounds of complaint. The Tribunal is satisfied the material before it requires that it uphold the complaint in...

8. Toilolo v Letalu [2014] NZIACDT 52 (15 April 2014) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...client engagement process. [2.3] He did not lodge the appeal, but dishonestly told his client he had done so. [2.4] He did not treat the unearned fee as client funds and instead took the money. [2.5] When his licence expired, he did nothing to protect his client. [3] The adviser has not challenged the statement of complaint, which set out these grounds. The Tribunal is satisfied the material before it requires that it uphold the complaint. The Statement of Complaint [4] The Registr...

9. Auckland Standards Committee No. 2 v Kennelly [2017] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...to reflect on his fitness to practise or as to bring his profession into disrepute. (s 241(c) of the Act). The charge relates to breaches of s 112(1)(a) and (c) of the Act, breaches of the Trust Account Regulations and of the Conduct and Client Care Rules. Particulars of the charge are annexed as Appendix 1. [2] The Tribunal was satisfied that the respondent’s admission of the charge was appropriate. It granted the applicant leave to withdraw the alternative charges of miscon...

10. LCRO 136/2021 YL v OB (28 February 2022) [pdf, 249 KB]

    ...this element of Ms YL’s complaint, is Rule 3 which provides that in providing regulated services to a client, a lawyer must always act competently and in a timely manner consistent with the terms of the retainer and the duty to take reasonable care.3 [38] In addressing complaint that he had on occasions failed to respond to specific request made of him, Mr OB in large part, did not take issue with Ms YL’s contention that he had, at times, failed to promptly follow up with reques...