5374 items matching your search terms
r 406 Form PPPR 4 Application for personal order Section 10, Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 at ……………………………… [place] ……………………………………………………………………………………….. [full name] ……………………………………………………………………………………….. [address] ………………………………………………...
...Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) may elect to conduct a review on the papers if he or she considers on the basis of all the information available, that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. [25] After having carefully traversed the material on the file, I concluded that it would be appropriate to allow Mr TX an opportunity to respond to concerns I had identified in the course of a consideration of the written material before me. Those concerns...
...with any orders made under section 74 of the Act. 3 Contents Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 4 Adverse Effects or Reactions to Medical/Surgical Care .............................................. 4 Choking ...................................................................................................................... 5 Deaths in Custody ...............................................
...it accepts that a solicitor who drafted the EPA made errors, it does not consider that these errors are the cause of IE’s loss. 3. The issues to be considered are: a. Did X Ltd owe a duty to provide advice to IE with reasonable skill and care? b. Did X Ltd breach that duty by providing incorrect advice? c. Are the losses claimed a consequence of that incorrect advice? d. If so, how much compensation should be awarded against X Ltd? Did X Ltd owe a duty to provide advice...
...[11] In a decision of the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal (HPDT), Re Tolland, the HPDT observed:1 Negligence, in the professional disciplinary context, does not require the prosecution to prove that there has been a breach of a duty of care and damage arising out of this as would be required in a civil claim. Rather, it requires an analysis as to whether the conduct complained of amount to a breach of duty in a professional setting by the practitioner. The test is whether o...
...is safe to do so 12 A. What if I can’t get consent? 12 B. When should I tell a person that I have shared their information? 13 C. Who can I share with if I do have consent? 13 Principle 3: You must consider sharing information if you think it will protect a victim or if you receive a request 14 A. Why is there a duty to consider sharing? 14 B. Why is sharing not compulsory? 14 Principle 4: You can share information for specific purposes 16 A. How do I request information? 16 B. How do...
...is safe to do so 12 A. What if I can’t get consent? 12 B. When should I tell a person that I have shared their information? 13 C. Who can I share with if I do have consent? 13 Principle 3: You must consider sharing information if you think it will protect a victim or if you receive a request 14 A. Why is there a duty to consider sharing? 14 B. Why is sharing not compulsory? 14 Principle 4: You can share information for specific purposes 16 A. How do I request information? 16 B. How do...
...the Act, in that he engaged in seriously negligent or incompetent real estate agency work and/or wilfully or recklessly contravened any or all of rr 5.1, 5.2, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 and/or 9.6 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012 (the Rules). 2. In the alternative, he engaged in unsatisfactory conduct. Particulars 1. By offering and/or marketing the property for sale without an agency agreement, in breach of r 9.6. 2. By failing to ensure a...
...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 111 APPLICANT MO RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay MO the sum of $1,103.00 on or before 26 March 2025. Reasons: 1. MO engaged X Ltd to apply paint protection film (PPF) to his freshly painted vehicle. 2. When MO viewed the painted and wrapped vehicle he had some concerns about the quality of the paint work, in particular paint runs, chips and nibs in the surface. Eventually he aske...
...shareholders/directors rejected mediation. He “accepted” that having acted for the company, the firm could not act for a prospective purchaser, including a shareholder. He said the firm’s role would be confined to advising the company about protecting its interests concerning the proposed restructure. [12] In response on 14 October 2019, Dr WM’s lawyer demanded the firm “forthwith cease acting” for the company. He said Dr WM intended laying a complaint with the Law So...