Warrington v Maidenhead LCRO 192 / 2009 (29 April 2010) [pdf, 108 KB]
...account for the credit of Seven, that he was an undischarged bankrupt and could not, for that reason, be in possession of this amount of money, and that it should have been returned to her. She believes that the Practitioner owed her a duty of care when he accepted her money into the trust account. She holds him accountable for this loss. [5] The Practitioner disputes any liability. He informed the Standards Committee that the company‟s sole shareholder/director, Mr Three.,...