BR v EP LCRO 008/2012 (3 September 2014) [pdf, 42 KB]
...particular concern to BR, is that EP did not, when completing his review, consult with BR. [12] In response, EP submits that: (i) BR has no standing to lodge a complaint against him. MS, not BR, was his client. (ii) He owed no duty of care to BR. (iii) He is unaware of any principle of law by which BR could legitimately assert he was owed a duty of care, nor could he sustain complaint that he had breached any professional ethic duty or standard of care owed to BR by refe...