Search Results

1. Ron-Mansfield-further-submisisons-for-Mr-Tarrant.pdf [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...position given his admitted role, it provides no advantage to our community if he does not take steps to correct these errors. The value of the report is diminished if it contains substantial errors as the exercise therefore fails to strengthen or to protect our community through its recommendations. 5.8 Further, the way the Royal Commission worked has failed to assist the families impacted as we have heard from all contributors on behalf of the families. They have not received a...

2. 08.-Evidence-of-Mr-Quentin-Parr-Ngati-Hikitanga.PDF [PDF, 263 KB]

   ...11. Ngāti Hikitanga's whakapapa connections to its ancestral lands are integral to its identity and its unique relationship as kaitiaki and manawhenua. The hapū’s whakapapa links it to its tūpuna (ancestors), who lived, thrived, and cared for the land throughout history. Page 5 12. Ngāti Hikitanga traces its origins back to renowned ancestress Hikitanga, the daughter of Kikopiri and grandmother of Te Paea. Ngāti Hikitanga has a close relationship to Ngāti Hu...

3. [2023] NZEmpC 164 F & B Remuera Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...evidence in support of that position, but if that is the case, there is a risk that the plaintiff’s right to bring a challenge may be limited. The Court of Appeal has noted that where an order will have that effect, it “should only be made after careful consideration and in a case in which the claim has little chance of success. Access to the courts for a genuine plaintiff is not lightly to be denied”.12 [29] Overall, having balanced the factors above, I consider that it is in...

4. Hawkes Bay Standards Committee v M [2013] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...and Mr Foote. These were all matters relevant to Ms H’s transaction the Standards Committee said, and should have been disclosed to her. [16] In his response of 17 October 2011 to the charge, Mr M denied the charge, stating that he had carefully discussed the matter with Ms H in obtaining her informed consent, and that he did not withhold any relevant information from Ms H in that process. [17] Mr M also denied that he had a relevant solicitor and client relationship with...

5. Appendix-2_James-Lambie_s87F-Report_Terrestrial-Ecology_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 756 KB]

   Section 87F Report – Ōtaki to North of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by James Lambie – Terrestrial Ecology 1 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) to Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council for resource consents to enable the construction, operation and maintenance of new state highway, shared use pat

6. [2014] NZEmpC 143 O’Connor v Auckland University Students Assoc Inc [pdf, 441 KB]

   ...general meeting of the society, which the University Council would collect and pass on to AUSA to represent and serve student members. [28] As a result of a law change in 1999, 13 students at UoA voted to make membership of AUSA voluntary. To protect its substantial assets, six independent trusts were established. The trusts return a dividend to AUSA as beneficiary of the trusts. Other sources of funding are the University itself, and its own fundraising

7. [2023] NZEnvC 163 Ngati Kuku Hapu v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 873 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 163 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN NGĀTI KUKU HAPŪ (ENV-2021-AKL-136) Appellant AND BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent AND TAURANGA BRIDGE MARINA LIMITED Applicant Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick Environment Commissioner A C E Leijnen Environment Commissioner J H

8. Tsai Mao TRI 2016-100-00010 [2018] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 [pdf, 491 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2016-100-00010 [2018] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 BETWEEN PHORINA CHIEH-HSIN TSAI AND FERGUS TI-WEN MAO First Claimants AND UPPER HUTT CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND MICHAEL ANTHONY BARROTT Second Respondent AND MICHAEL DANIEL KEANE (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND PANELCRETE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 40222) (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND PHILLIP ERIC GORRIE AND ROBYN JUNE BOND Fifth Respondent A

9. NZCVS Core Report Cycle 3 (2020) [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   ...the work to New Zealand Ministry of Justice and abide by the other licence terms. Please note you may not use any departmental or governmental emblem, logo, or coat of arms in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Use the wording “New Zealand Ministry of Justice” in your attribution. Do not use the New Zealand Ministry of Justice logo. If you have any feedback or questions about NZCVS results, please email us on nzcvs@justice....

10. BORA Parihaka Reconciliation Bill [pdf, 4.3 MB]

    C ' Te 'fitri Turco le Karauna rown Law 1 August 2017 Attorney-General Parihaka Reconciliation Bill v2.10- Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Our Ref: ATT395/273 Please find attached advice on whether the Parihaka Reconciliation Bill is consistent with the rights and freedoms set out in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. The advice concludes that the Bill is not inconsistent with the Bill of Rights Act. Please indicate whether you accept