Search Results

1. LCRO 117/2018 VR v BJ (30 August 2019) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...provided to Ms BJ that “show a disputed debt prior to the [H]igh [C]ourt action” initiated by her client. [16] Mr VR claimed Ms BJ “abused the process” referred to in r 2.3 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules) which prohibits a lawyer issuing a statutory demand in circumstances where the lawyer knows, or fails to make enquiries that the debt “is bona fide disputed”.3 [17] He said the debt concerned advertising the...

2. JV Budget Summary of Initiatives FVSV Package 2019 Christle [pdf, 887 KB]

   ...training for health practitioners in District Health Boards. This will be done through funding for practitioners to routinely deliver effective screening and referrals, and to explore the provision of a training programme for primary health care providers (including GPs, nurses, dental nurses). BENEFITS/IMPACTS • Effective screening and referrals from health care providers in hospitals. • Consultation on the potential to extend the training programme for primary health c...

3. LCRO 150/2018 LO v RS, NL and TA (28 June 2019) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...Section 206 allows a Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) to conduct the review on the basis of all the information available if the LCRO considers the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. [40] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the application for review, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that n...

4. Mabruk v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 409) and Watson (not participating in appeal) [2018] NZREADT 74 [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...the decision of Complaints Assessment Committee 409 (“the Committee”), dated 10 April 2018, in which it found that he had engaged in unsatisfactory conduct by breaching a number of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012 (“the Rules”) (“the substantive decision”). He has also appealed against the Committee’s decision, dated 23 July 2018, in which the Committee censured him and ordered him to pay a fine of $1,000 (“the penalty dec...

5. 2024 NZPSPLA 023 pdf [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...would be disproportionate to the Authority’s findings. (ii) The nature of the complaint contains sensitive details regarding the complainant and Ms JK. [71] Accordingly, the decision of 15 March is to be published with adequate suppression to protect the identify of all persons named in this decision. DATED at Wellington this 2nd day of March 2024 K A Lash Deputy Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority 8 Section 4 of the Act

6. LCRO 68/2023 QB v VN (5 September 2024) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...[41] It was his view that the case law referenced supported conclusion that the Committee had failed to apply correct principles when considering the test to be applied when addressing question as to whether a lawyer had breached r 2.7. [42] I have carefully examined the cases referenced by Mr QB. [43] With every respect to him, I see nothing in those cases (and I have attentively referenced the specific paragraphs in the cases he has referred me to) that assist him in the argument he a...

7. LCRO 37/2025 PE v LZ (26 August 2025) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...dealt with by Ms T; (c) the respondent was not responsible for what occurred following his departure; (d) there had been no significant delays such as to constitute a breach of r 3 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules). 6 [20] The Committee considered that the evidence did not establish that the respondent had failed to advise the applicant that costs might be awarded to the winning party and, on the contrary, considered t...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 69 Head v IRD [pdf, 679 KB]

   ...employment arrangements for the plaintiffs in detail. Some 16 volumes of documents were also produced. Very comprehensive submissions were advanced by all counsel in support of the parties’ respective positions. All this material has been carefully considered. Difference between recruitment services and labour-hire arrangements [38] At the heart of the plaintiffs’ case is the assertion that the reality of the arrangements they entered into was they were recruited by Madison...

9. OIA-124466.pdf [pdf, 7.4 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 3 September 2025 Our ref: OIA 124466 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Information regarding electoral matters Thank you for your email of 4 August 2025 requesting information, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), regarding voting and enrolments. Specifically, you requested: 1. All written documents, reports, memoranda,

10. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 69 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    TE RŌPŪ WHAKAMANA I TE TIRITI O WAITANGI Kohi-Tātea 2016 | January 2016 ISSUE 69 Kia puta ki te whai ao ki te ao mārama From the world of darkness moving into the world of light Te Manutukutuku 40 The Waitangi Tribunal Level 7, Fujitsu Tower 141 The Terrace Wellington New Zealand DX SX11237 Tel : 64 4 914 3000 Fax : 64 4 914 3001 www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Te Manutukutuku is produced and published by the Waitangi Tribunal Unit of the Ministry of Justice, and every effort has