LCRO 204/2017 CA and KB v MN [pdf, 102 KB]
...applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) to take no further action in respect of their complaint concerning the conduct of the respondent, Mr MN who was appointed by the Family Court pursuant to the Protection of Personal Property Rights Act 1988 (PPPR) as lawyer for their father, Mr RA. Background [2] The complainants refer to a dispute between them and their brother, GA. The complainants say that Mr UX was appointed by the Court i...