5435 items matching your search terms
...but she took no steps to correct the matter. 3 Affidavit of David James More dated 20 th August 2012, Exhibit “A” at page 18 of the Standards Committee Bundle. 8 [30] The need to protect the public and the need to maintain public confidence in the legal profession are key elements in the professional disciplinary regime in which we operate. These elements were spelt out in Bolton v Law Society4 and they have subseq...
...Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012, and fell short of the standard that a reasonable member of the public is entitled to expect from a reasonably competent licensee.4 Sentencing principles [11] The principal purpose of the Act is to “promote and protect the interests of consumers in respect of transactions that relate to real estate and to promote public confidence in the performance of real estate agency work.”5 The Act achieves these purposes by regulating agents, branch man...
...6.10 provide a verdict would not be affected because a person was deferred or excused from jury service, or served on a jury, because of steps taken pursuant to the new powers in paragraphs 6.1 – 6.8; Clarify the relationship between open justice protections and health and safety measures through the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 7 agreed to clarify that the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 relating to public and media access to criminal proceedings do not affect the ability...
...CT’s will and the power of appointment does not vest in Mr WU alone. Elsewhere53 Mr MQ/Mr CT assert that what Mr CT wanted was for Mr MQ to be the executor of his estate. [75] The difference is subtle, but important, and it would have taken some careful explanation to ensure Mr CT comprehended the difference. It would also raise the level of understanding required of Mr CT. [76] In considering this question, it is perhaps of some relevance, that the focus of the complaints has...
...Children Act 2004 • Coroners Act 2006 • Courts Security Act 1999 • Criminal Disclosure Act 2008 • Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 • District Courts Act 2016 • Employment Relations Act 2000 • Juries Act 1981 • Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 • Senior Courts Act 2016 Tribunals • Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 • Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 • Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 • Remuneration...
...Baines Hearing: at New Plymouth on 19-23 March 2018, 31 May 2018, 1 June 2018 and 27-30 August 2018 Site visit undertaken on 20 March 2018 Appearances: R B Enright and R G Haazen for Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated and for Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated M G Conway and C G Coyle for South Taranaki District Council , New Plymouth District Council, Stratford District Council and Powerco Limited D Allen and V Brunton for Petroleum Exploration...
ANA SHAW v BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2022] NZEmpC 10 [4 February 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 10 EMPC 4/2019 EMPC 360/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ANA SHAW Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 15–17 June and 2 July 2021
STATEMENT OF CHARLES LAMBERT IN SUPPORT OF NGĀTI PĀHAUWERA TAKUTAI MOANA NEGOTIATIONS I, CHARLES LAMBERT, Trustee/Manager, of Mohaka Township Road, Mohaka, would like to state that: 1. I support Ngāti Pāhauwera Development Trust in their application for this Takutai Moana claim. I am a Trustee for Ngāti Pāhauwera Development Trust. 2. I gave evidence in 2008 under the old Seabed and Foreshore Law. Attached to this letter is a copy of my 2008 evidence which
1 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information.
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 17 Reference No. HRRT 017/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN LOUISA HARERUIA WALL Plaintiff AND FAIRFAX NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Defendant AND THE MARLBOROUGH EXPRESS Second Defendant AND THE CHRISTCHURCH PRESS Third Defendant AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms