Search Results

1. RIS Regulatory Systems Justice Amendment Bill package [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Children Act 2004 • Coroners Act 2006 • Courts Security Act 1999 • Criminal Disclosure Act 2008 • Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003 • District Courts Act 2016 • Employment Relations Act 2000 • Juries Act 1981 • Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 • Senior Courts Act 2016 Tribunals • Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 • Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 • Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 • Remuneration...

2. Ngati Pahauwera Affidavits 3 of 4 [pdf, 30 MB]

   STATEMENT OF CHARLES LAMBERT IN SUPPORT OF NGĀTI PĀHAUWERA TAKUTAI MOANA NEGOTIATIONS I, CHARLES LAMBERT, Trustee/Manager, of Mohaka Township Road, Mohaka, would like to state that: 1. I support Ngāti Pāhauwera Development Trust in their application for this Takutai Moana claim. I am a Trustee for Ngāti Pāhauwera Development Trust. 2. I gave evidence in 2008 under the old Seabed and Foreshore Law. Attached to this letter is a copy of my 2008 evidence which

3. [2018] NZEnvC 227 Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Baines Hearing: at New Plymouth on 19-23 March 2018, 31 May 2018, 1 June 2018 and 27-30 August 2018 Site visit undertaken on 20 March 2018 Appearances: R B Enright and R G Haazen for Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated and for Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated M G Conway and C G Coyle for South Taranaki District Council , New Plymouth District Council, Stratford District Council and Powerco Limited D Allen and V Brunton for Petroleum Exploration...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ANA SHAW v BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2022] NZEmpC 10 [4 February 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 10 EMPC 4/2019 EMPC 360/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ANA SHAW Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 15–17 June and 2 July 2021

5. Appendix-4_Peter-Kinley_-s87F-Report_Flooding-and-Hydrology_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

   .................................. 12 Review of whether the design meets the proposed thresholds ........... 14 The assessment of freeboard ............................................................. 16 The approach to assessing the effects of scour protection ................. 17 The assessment of the effects of the works on flooding of buildings ... 19 The assessment of debris arrestors ................................................... 20 The peer review ..................................

6. Submissions summary: Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice reforms (second consultation round) [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   1 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information.

7. Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd [2017] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 17 Reference No. HRRT 017/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN LOUISA HARERUIA WALL Plaintiff AND FAIRFAX NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Defendant AND THE MARLBOROUGH EXPRESS Second Defendant AND THE CHRISTCHURCH PRESS Third Defendant AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms

8. Auckland Standards Committee v Clews [2014] NZLCDT 19 [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...practitioner had already breached privilege with his “eagerness” to assist. [24] Mr McCoubrey submitted on behalf of the Standards Committee that this was not to be considered a “simple error”. He submitted that the fundamental nature of the protection of a client’s privilege in relation to his communications with his legal representative means that a breach of such must be far along the continuum of professional misbehaviour. [25] We accept that submission. A client m...

9. LCRO 131/2017 GR v [Area] Standards Committee [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...of any decision pursuant to s 206(4) of the Act, if publication is necessary or desirable in the public interest. 9 [50] I agree with the Committee. There is educative value in publishing a decision such as this, although there is no public protection purpose to be served by identifying Mr GR. [51] Undertakings are fundamental to the practice of law. There are excellent reasons for principals to limit who can give undertakings, to closely monitor undertakings that are given,...

10. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hintze [2017] NZLCDT 13 [pdf, 97 KB]

    ...following aspects of seriousness: (a) Not completing work, leaving clients unrepresented. (b) Lack of professionalism, not forwarding files, not providing adequate advice. (c) His breach of ethical requirements meant that his clients were not “protected”. (d) Retention of fees which was dishonest. [16] Counsel for the respondent argued for a lesser period of suspension from practice. He submitted that account should be taken of the respondent having gained insight and un...