Search Results

1. Te Au Reka Phase 2 Court Rules Consultation Paper [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...other similar rules, will be adjusted to reflect that matters such as a delivery time or time of service will be automatically recorded when that action occurs through Te Au Reka. 2.6 Matters relating to privacy and security information Privacy protections Current requirements in primary legislation or court rules relating to privacy protections (for example, the ability of an applicant under the HDCRs to request their identity is not released, see rule 15) will be preserved in Te...

2. Linney v Hart [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...‘tanking’ suitable for preventing moisture ingress into the dwelling. (Refer to Footnotes 1 at end of this section). iv) Backfill with drainage aggregate. 5.3.12 Replace damaged sections of wall cladding. Complete the wall cladding to ensure full protection from rain water and moisture vapour. 5.3.13 Seal the gap between fibrous cement ‘weatherboards’ and the sheet cladding below. Garage/Entranceway 10 Claim 1083:Determination 5.3.14 Field drains for...

3. Piper v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 408) & Ors [2017] NZREADT 32 [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...of the consequent reduction in the value of the property. [f] After the visit to the Council, Mr Piper went to the offices of Watercare, in Newmarket. He was told that redevelopment or rebuilding was possible, provided that the line was protected (for example, by a “bridge” over it). He then returned to the Agency. [g] In his response to the complaint, Mr Piper said that: When returning to work [after the visit to Watercare] I proceeded to phone all customers that...

4. Inaia Tonu Nei - Hui Maori - Combined version PDF [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   Kua tae te wā Te Pūrongo a Te Hui Māori HŌNGONGOI 2019 Hei whakarāpopoto tēnei pūrongo i ngā kōrero i puta rā i te hui e kīa nei Ināia Tonu Nei – Hui Māori i tū i Rotorua mai i te 5–7 Āperira 2019. Nā tētahi tira iti i tuhi ngā kōrero o te Hui Māori, nāna hoki i kohi ngā whakaaro mai i ngā whakawhitinga kōrero, i ngā kauwhau me ngā mahi ā-rōpū. Te whāinga o tēnei pukapuka he hopu i ngā kōrero i puta i te Hui, me te tāpae horopaki hoki mō te pūta

5. CAC 20006 v Wallace [2013] NZREADT 46 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...a building defects report recommending that the entire house be reclad, and that decayed timber framing be replaced, at an estimated cost of $250,000. [24] Very sadly, Mrs Kern passed away in hospital on 8 December 2010. [25] Mrs Watkinson was carefully cross-examined on the basis that the defendant denied that he was even asked by Mrs Kern whether the home was a leaky house. The witness asserted that she heard the discussion referred to above as she was only about one metre away from...

6. LCRO 139/2020 MX v RJ and DJ (30 September 2021) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...funds may have been required for immediate release, can be reasonably criticised to the degree that the criticism would provide reasonable grounds for establishing a breach meriting of a disciplinary response. [126] No broader issues of consumer protection or public welfare have been raised by this issue. [127] I see no grounds which could persuade me to depart from the Committee’s decision. 15 CW v XB LCRO 213/2010 at [16]. 21 Anonymised publication [128] Pursuant...

7. BORA - Abortion Legislation Bill: Crown Law's advice [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...Committee’s recent General comment No 36 (2018) on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life. In that General comment the Committee does not refer to any right to life for a foetus, focusing instead on protecting women and girls from unsafe abortions.13 14. The above authorities and our analysis point to the conclusion that a foetus does not enjoy the right not to be deprived of life under s 8 of the Bill of Rights Act. Accordingly...

8. Milligan v Robert Brown Developments Ltd [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...CLAIMANT’S DWELLING 24 The liability of the Second respondent, Stewart Ross 24 The liability of the Third respondent, Eastwood 27 The liability of the Fourth respondent, the Council 29 Did the council exercise the requisite standard of care when performing its functions, duties, and obligations under the building Act 1991 32 COSTS 39 CONCLUSION AND ORDERS 40 STATEMENT OF CONSEQUENCES 41 3 INTRODUCTION [1] This is a claim concern...

9. [2018] NZEnvC 179 Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC r=J-q of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a Notice of Motion under s 87G of the Act requesting the granting of resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED ('PANUKU') (ENV-2018-AKL-0

10. Waitangi Tribunal Part 1 Report on stage 1 of the Te Paparahi o Te Raki inquiry [pdf, 6.1 MB]

    H e W H a k a p u t a n g a m e t e t i r i t i t H e D e c l a r a t i o n a n D t H e t r e a t y He Whakaputanga me te Tiriti The Declaration and the Treaty Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W A I 1 0 4 0 The Report on Stage 1 of the