LCRO 40/2021 PT v UT and RL t/a Law Firm A (28 April 2022) [pdf, 266 KB]
...Mr PT’s response to the complaint and having then formed the view that Mr PT’s response was lacking in contrition, Mr RL and Mr UT considered that it would be appropriate for the 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules). 5 Committee to direct that Mr PT provide [LAW FIRM A], Mr SZ, Mrs QT and Ms AI, with a letter of apology. [16] Mr JK (for Mr PT) provided a further response to the complaints on 20 December 2019. It was su...