Search Results

Search results for care and protection.

5382 items matching your search terms

  1. Hide v Official Assignee (Confidentiality Claim) [2019] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 302 KB]

    ...regard to— (i) the time that has elapsed since the communication was made or the information was compiled or prepared; and (ii) the extent to which the information has already been disclosed to other persons; and (g) society’s interest in protecting the privacy of victims of offences and, in particular, victims of sexual offences. (4) The Judge may, in addition to the matters stated in subsection (3), have regard to any other matters that the Judge considers relevant. (5)...

  2. [2020] NZEnvC 137 Oceana Gold New Zealand Limited v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 312 KB]

    ...KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 137 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals under clause 14 of Schedule 1 to the Act BETWEEN OCEANA GOLD (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED (ENV-2016-CHC-103) ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-CHC-102) ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-CHC-122) Appellants AND OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Co...

  3. LCRO 086/2017 AC v BD (15 November 2018) [pdf, 206 KB]

    ...which allows a Legal Complaints Review Officer (LCRO) to conduct the review on the basis of all information available if the LCRO considers that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. [32] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the application for review, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that necess...

  4. ENV-2018-AKL-000150 Brookby Quarries Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.3 MB]

    NOTICE OF APPEAL 26 JULY 2018 Counsel instructed: Solicitors acting: Russell Bartlett QC / Bal Matheson D J Minhinnick / L J Eaton C/- Richmond Chambers P +64 9 367 8000 33 Shortland Street F +64 9 367 8163 PO Box 1008 PO Box 8 Auckland 1140 DX CX10085 Auckland BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ENV–2018 –AKL - AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO I TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE UNDER the Local Government Act (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (&

  5. JR v SW LCRO 91/2014 (27 March 2015) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...appears to be over-zealous time recording and the rendering of invoices reflecting simply the value of time recorded by the relevant authors with no apparent recognition of the other factors that need to be addressed in Rule 9.1 of the Client Care Rules; and (c) The litmus test being that the fees charged to the body corporate (contrary to [SW Law Firm’s] advice of cost efficiency if that firm was instructed because of Mr SW having undertaken similar assignments) are in excess of...

  6. IK v VR LCRO 227/2014 (21 December 2015) [pdf, 102 KB]

    ...Service about aspects of IK’s representation of her. The complaint alleged: • A failure by Mr IK to hold fees she had paid in advance, in a trust account (the trust account complaint). • A failure by Mr IK to provide engagement and client care information (the terms of engagement complaint). • A failure by Mr IK promptly to invoice Ms VR (the invoice complaint). • A failure by Mr IK to return documents to Ms VR following termination of the retainer (the documents complain...

  9. Kai Tahu Ki Otago - EiC - E Ellison - Culture (5 Feb 2021) [PDF, 1.3 MB]

    ...supported by them. Tribal whakapapa gives rise to a spiritual relationship and respect for the mauri (life force) evident in wai māori, and to the rights inherent in rakatirataka and the associated and fundamental duties of kaitiakitaka. 8. The protection of the wāhi tūpuna (cultural landscapes) that reflect the long history and traditions associated with the settlement of Otago by Kāi Tahu whānui is sought by mana whenua. 9. Following shortly after the signing of Te T...

  10. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 Block (2011) 34 Waiariki MB 151 (34 WAR 151) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...of fronts including the settlement negotiations. 34 Waiariki MB 159 [38] According to the Supreme Court in the decision Haronga v Waitangi Tribunal 3 the relationship between tribal and Māori land interests is not clear cut and must be carefully considered. That this applies to the Māori Land Court as well as the Waitangi Tribunal is clear from the preamble in ss2 and 17 of the Act. Undertakings as to damages and risks to the trust [39] Counsel contended that while the...