Search Results

1. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 DM Piritahi Kathryn Ngapo [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...because Waiheke is my turangawaewae and I feel the responsibility of kaitiakitanga for this place, which also has formed me. 4. I am a teacher by profession and I relieve or take temporary contracts when I am able, as I have been responsible for the care of family members including my mother Minnie, who has dementia, since 2000. I have contributed to the Waiheke Community through my 10 year involvement with Playcentre (1982 -92), as a committee member of the Waiheke Credit Union (...

2. Steele v Board of Trustees of Salisbury School [2012] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...fixed by s 40(1) of the Privacy Act 1993 and thereby interfered with his privacy. The relief sought in the statement of claim is: (a) Internet, telephone and travel costs of approximately $100. 2 (b) $2,000 for “the interference with the care of my child”. (c) $5,000 for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings. [2] While some documents containing personal information were provided by the Board almost immediately, the Board admits that certain documents were not...

3. Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation- Section 53 Block IX, Opunake Survey District (2005) 159 Aotea MB 146 (159 AOT 146) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...in section 137 were intended for exceptional instances where orthodox voting requirements were ilnpossible to entertain, at page 266: "Section 137 is very clearly an exceptions process. It is designed to allow trustees to avoid the usual protections against absolute alienation. It allows them to avoid both the spirit and intent of the Preamble to the Act and s2(2}. It is drafted in precise and narrow terms for that reason. It is to be applied only where there is a ~ Minute B...

4. [2020] NZREADT 38 - Barfoot v Real Estate Agents Authority (26 August 2020) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...as he accepts through his counsel Mr Rea, responsible for supervision of Ms Feng and Mr Dunne under section 50 of the Act. [3] Ms Feng and Mr Dunne were found to have breached various of the Real Estate Agents (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012 (“the Rules”). The matter was the subject of a complaint that was made in regard to Mr Dunne following errors being made in the description of a residential property which he was marketing. The errors related to the des...

5. [2021] NZIACDT 4 - SL v Mackintosh (4 March 2021) [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...breaches of the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the Code). [3] Ms Mackintosh explains her circumstances at the time, but admits her misconduct. BACKGROUND [4] Ms Mackintosh, a licensed immigration adviser, is a director of Care Immigration Ltd, of Auckland. [5] The complainant is a national of India. She arrived in New Zealand in about March 2015 and at various times held student, work search and graduate work experience visas. She had a Bachelor of...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 075 McCallum Bros Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   McCallum Bros Limited v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 075 IN THE MATTER OF appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN MCCALLUM BROS LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-121) Appellant/Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge J A Smith Judge A H C Warren Commissioner S Myers Commissioner K Prime Special Advisor R Howie Hea

7. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Morahan [2017] NZLCDT 24 [pdf, 531 KB]

   ...secured against her Tolhurst Road property; (c) On the subdivision of Rosetta Road; (d) The transfer of that property to the trust; (e) The process of her becoming a trustee of the trust. [31] The respondent admitted that he had an obligation to protect Ms B’s interest in respect of those matters. It is clear that she was not given independent advice about any of the relevant issues at the time. [32] The respondent explained that (with the exception of the Rosetta Road pro...

8. CAC 10047 v Whiteford - Penalty [2011] NZREADT 16 [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...interest to a purchaser was less serious than a failure to make such disclosure to a client vendor. [8] We accept that an agent owes a fiduciary duty to a client vendor and not a purchaser. The Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) rules 2009 defines a customer as being “a person who is a buyer or potential buyer of land or a business and who is not a client”. This means that a “customer” of a real estate agent is a purchaser and a “client” is a ven...

9. REAA v Randall [2011] NZREADT 40 [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...decisions which we have referred to in the Memorandum of Consent. That means that those Orders of the Authority stand and they involve fines of over $9,000 and orders about taking relevant education. As a result of those appeals being withdrawn, the carefully reasoned Orders made by the Authority stand. [8] We take into account that Mr Randall is willing to undertake educational courses of the type referred to. We hope he will learn from those that he certainly must show a vendor...

10. BQ v CR LCRO 281/2012 (28 August 2014) [pdf, 45 KB]

    ...Mr CR is exposed to any complaint in this regard. 5 Dr Matthew Downs (ed) Cross on Evidence (looseleaf ed. Lexis Nexis) at [EVA 54.15]. 6 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, Rule 8. 7 This statement is not intended to reflect any decision as to whether Mr CR has complied or not with the reporting obligations. 4 [17] Finally, in this decision, I do not need to address the question of who now...