Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 195 Canyon Vineyard Limited v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 913 KB]

   ...expressing a complaint that the effects on Canyon were difficult to assess. [38] That said, we acknowledge Canyon's point that the evidence originally submitted by Bendigo fell short of the standard expected by the court. [39] Having given careful consideration to the applications and to the competing legal submissions, we are broadly in agreement with Bendigo's criticisms of Canyon's case. We note that our substantive decision set out many of the reasons for that,...

2. Livingstone v Rawhiti - Tokaanu Township 2B (2025) 496 Aotea MB 45 (296 AOT 45) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...with the retention of Māori land and the effective use, management, and development of that land by the owners, the court should provide ways to determine or facilitate the settlement of disputes and other matters among owners. This includes protection of minority interests in any land against an oppressive majority, and to protection of majority interests against an unreasonable minority. Also to ensure fairness in dealings with the owners of any land in multiple ownership, and to...

3. Iosefa v New Zealand Law Society [2024] NZLCDT 26 (28 August 2024) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...profession. (c) The evaluation of whether an applicant meets the standard is a forward looking exercise. The Court must assess at the time of the application the risk of future misconduct or of harm to the profession. The evaluation is accordingly a protective one. Punishment for past conduct has no place. (d) The concept of a fit and proper person in s 55 involves consideration of whether the applicant is honest, trustworthy and a person of integrity. (e) When assessing past con...

4. [2025] NZEmpC 217 Fuimaono v Ritchies Murphy Transport Solutions Limited [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...order for security is just in all the circumstances. Balancing the interests and consideration of merits [15] The balancing of the interests of the parties is an overriding consideration. This involves balancing Ritchies’ interest to be protected from a barren costs order against Mr Fuimaono’s right to access justice. [16] Mr Fuimaono submits that a substantial order for security will prevent him from pursuing his challenge. The Courts recognise that an order having...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 171 Timaru District Council [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...to come within the ambit of s86B(3) and have immediate legal effect upon notification. Section 86B(3)(a) applies to a rule that “protects or relates to water, air or soil (for soil conservation”. [87] The proposed suite of rules are about protecting the supply of community drinking water to the district, although they regulate activities involving land use and subdivision for the protection of water. [88] The protection of the quality of the community water supply from the e...

6. WQ v Emberson [2019] NZIACDT 28 (8 May 2019) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...well aware that his agreement was with the law firm. She believed that the complainant and the law firm were complicit in the complaint to the Authority. It was a malicious, frivolous, and vexatious complaint to undermine someone with a spotless career of 16 years in immigration. [29] Ms Emberson set out how she came to work at the law firm. She had expected a written agreement with the firm and was given all sorts of excuses as to why the agreement and her Dubai visa, sponsore...

7. LCRO 6/2022 ZED Limited v RK (21 February 2022) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...the fact that the core instructions to Mr RK of issuing judicial review proceedings, were necessarily supplemented by injunction and caveat proceedings. The supplementary litigation produced a desired result for Mr YP in that his position was protected pending disposition of the judicial review proceedings. [87] An arithmetical calculation of the nett fees charged divided by Mr RK’s hourly rate, produces total time spent on the litigation and its related issues, of some 85 hours....

8. Bennett - Estate of Ronald Clifford Bennett (2017) 156 Waiariki MB 250 (156 WAR 250) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...(2) The court shall not make an order under this section in favour of any person whose claim, in the opinion of the court, fell or falls within the jurisdiction of the High Court under the Law Reform (Testamentary Promises) Act 1949 or the Family Protection Act 1955. 156 Waiariki MB 260 (3) In enacting this provision, Parliament has in mind particularly the possibility of injustice arising in individual cases from the prohibitions enacted by this Act against the alienation o...

9. Regulatory Systems Amendment Bill [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...ensuring that a company does not have to lose its licence when it loses its agent license holder. 46. Explicitly include a requirement that a temporary licensee be a ‘fit and proper person’ to hold a licence. Ensure consumers are protected and maintain public confidence in the profession. 14 No. Act Amendment Expected impacts 47. Provide the Registrar of the Authority with a discretionary power to exempt an application for a licence from the requirement to...

10. Martin v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2025] NZACC 35 (26 February 2025) [pdf, 263 KB]

    ...changed the treatment provided. [12] The parties agreed to phrase the issue to be determined as: Was Mr Chou’s decision to conduct left ulnar osteotomy correct – in other words, did that decision deviate from an objective standard of care? Medical Background. [13] Ms Martin presented to the emergency department at Wellington hospital on 5 December 2020. She left after being triaged but at that point the conclusion was a decreased range of motion and no deformity seen. A...