Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 037 Ngai Tamahaua Hapu Committee v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 782 KB]

   ...been set out in any of the notices of appeal. [21] In conclusion, the Hapu Committee submitted the Court should weigh the purpose and principles of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act in considering their application, in particular the protection and preservation of historical and cultural heritage and the principle ofleast possible alteration or loss. Respondent's Submissions [22] Counsel for HNZPT made brief written submissions. She noted that the scope of the m...

2. Review Subcommittees v PG 22/2016 (30 November 2016) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...account rendered by XM and their obligation arose through the terms of the lease. This ‘indirect’ obligation to pay nonetheless renders the lessee ‘chargeable’ with the bill of costs. To decide otherwise would be to deny the consumer protection focus of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act. [18] The authority of the subcommittees to make the complaint through their chairmen derives from the statute rather than from the terms of the lease. [19] Another important issue that w...

3. National Standards Committee v Jefferies [2016] NZLCDT 29 [pdf, 40 KB]

   ...interest (which include “protection of the public”), to maintain professional standards, to impose sanctions on a practitioner for breach of his/her duties, and to provide scope for rehabilitation in appropriate cases. Tribunals are required to carefully consider alternatives to striking off a practitioner. If the purposes of imposing disciplinary sanctions can be achieved short of striking off then it is the lesser alternative that – in this decision a full bench of the High Co...

4. MOJ0501 Childrens Guide to Separation booklet [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...You’ll probably want to keep seeing both your parents. And your grandparents and cousins, aunts and uncles too. Let your parents know. Tell them how Will I still see everyone? If you don’t feel safe with one of your parents, you can be protected from them. It’s your right to be safe all the time, no matter who’s looking after you. If you’re worried about your safety, tell an adult you trust. You can also call the phone numbers listed at the back of this booklet. you...

5. [2025] NZLCDT 20 National Standards Committee 1 v Peters (9 April 2025) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...in the future. [32] Mr Peters is clear that he is now at a different stage of his life and that he has learned a great deal from his recent experiences. He assures the Tribunal that he will not reoffend in the future. 7 [33] We carefully considered the Daniels5 principle of “least restrictive intervention”. We also considered the words of her Honour Winkelmann J in Hart where she said:6 …the manner in which the practitioner has responded to the charges may als...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...incur a warning in respect of an offence if the supervisor decides that formal disciplinary action is required. … v) Failure to follow the reasonable instruction of a supervisor or other authorised agent of the employer. … ix) Personal protective equipment (PPE) is provided for the safety and wellbeing of all employees. Failure to use or wear agreed PPE as instructed is foolhardy and unacceptable. [12] Then cl 31 deals with warnings for misconduct “outside that which...

7. OIA-111066.pdf [pdf, 11 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 26 April 2024 Our ref: OIA 111066 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Dispute resolution policies Thank you for your email of 4 April 2024, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Ministry of Justice’s (the Ministry) dispute resolution policies. Specifically,

8. BORA New Zealand Intelligence and Security Bill [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...and c. clauses 153 and 185 create offences for publishing or broadcasting information relating to an Inspector-General’s inquiry or the identity of an employee of an intelligence and security agency. 15. We also note that the amendments to the Protected Disclosures Act 2000 limit the scope of whom a protected disclosure may be made to. Clause 267 will replace s 12 of the Protected Disclosures Act to require an intelligence and security agency, or any...

9. Evaluation of Parenting Hearings programme pilot [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   1 The Parenting Hearings Programme Pilot: Evaluation Report The Parenting Hearings Programme Pilot: Evaluation Report The Parenting Hearings Programme Pilot: Evaluation Report Trish Knaggs and Anne Harland Research, Evaluation and Modelling Unit September 2009 2 The Parenting Hearings Programme Pilot: Evaluation Report Publis

10. LCRO 158/2018 YCH v TSR (30 September 2020) [pdf, 396 KB]

    ...will. [86] Ms TSR denies she met with Mr YCH. She says there was only one meeting, the week after Mr ASR’s death, attended by her, Ms BSR, Mr QSR and Ms UIL. She says at that stage she andMs BSR had not decided which will “would be best to protect” their and Ms UIL’s interests. [87] She says Mr YCH, in his correspondence to the beneficiaries, explained his preference for the 2013 will because his father, an executor under the 1996 will, had died leaving Mr QSR as survi...