4593 items matching your search terms
IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2019] NZIACDT 8 Reference No: IACDT 002/16 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN NILESH GOVIND Complainant AND ASHWINI CHANDRA Adviser DECISION (Sanctions) Date: 19 February 2019 REPRESENTATION: Registrar:
...where their quality, reputation or other characteristic is essentially attributable to that origin (e.g. Central Otago Wine). 3. The Bill introduces a new provision in the Act’s purpose (new s 3(c)) that says one of the purposes of the Act is to protect the interests of consumers of wine and spirits in New Zealand by providing assurance that a wine or spirit using a registered GI originates in the territory, region, or locality to which the registered GI relates. 4. The Bill amends th...
...Committee to take no further action on his complaint against Ms UH. [2] Ms UH was counsel for VM in proceedings that were before the Family Court. The subject of the proceedings was Ms VM’s grandchildren. The children had been in Ms VM’s care. The proceedings were initiated by the children’s grandfather, who was seeking day-to-day care of the children. At the time the proceedings were filed, the children’s grandfather was residing with Mr SW. [3] The Court made timetabli...
...Judge, after consultation with the then Children, Young Persons and Their Families Service, the Ministry of Health, the Police and, as it was then known, the Department for Courts. The aim of the protocol was to assist those who are concerned with the care and protection of children and who may wish to obtain an appropriate order from a Court in any emergency situation which might pose a threat to the life or wellbeing of any child. At that time the Family Court did not have jurisdiction to ord...
Appendix B. The kaupapa inquiry programme Updated: January 2024 Order Inquiry Indicative issues in registered claims 1 Māori military veterans (Wai 2500) Discrimination, recognition, disproportionate risk of harm, inadequate care and rehabilitation, land alienation, farm resettlement and economic opportunity, welfare and entitlements, cultural practices 2 Health services and outcomes (Wai 2575): - Stage 1: Primary healthcare system - Stage 2: Priority issues – mental health;...
...free up 25% of Family Court judge time. 8 The Bill amends several family law related statutes to enable the Family Court Associate to undertake some of the powers of a judge: 8.1 Family Court Act 1980; 8.2 Adoption Act 1955; 8.3 Care of Children Act 2004; 8.4 Child Support Act 1991; 8.5 Family Proceedings Act 1980; 8.6 Family Violence Act 2018; 8.7 Marriage Act 1955; 8.8 Oranga Tamariki Act 1989; 8.9 Property (Relationships) Act 1976;...
...are integrally linked with water and land through whakapapa, and this relationship is fundamental to the identity of Kāi Tahu as mana whenua. This connection carries rakatira rights for mana whenua and also imposes kaitiakitaka obligations to care for wai māori and the life it supports. 4 The condition of water is seen as a reflection of the condition of the people - when the wai is healthy, the people are strong and healthy and so too is their mana. 5 The protection of maur...
...is that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. SUMMARY OF THE ADVICE 3. There is some uncertainty in New Zealand law as to the scope of the right to the benefit of a lesser penalty, as protected by section 25(g) of the Bill of Rights Act. Two judges of the Supreme Court have expressed a clear view that the right extends beyond legislative changes to the maximum penalty and includes changes to the penalty available to the sente...
...matters detailed at [14] above, are set out in LCRO 183/2021. Mr WB’s second complaint and the Standards Committee decision. [16] Mr WB appeared in the [City] District Court on [Date] 2020. [17] At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court issued a Protection Order in favour of Mr WB’s wife and daughter. A copy of the order was served on Mr WB on [Date] 2020. [18] Mr WB’s second complaint focuses on concerns that Mr XD failed to adequately inform and advise him as to the con...
...not normally of itself impose a duty of care on one solicitor to the client of the other. Normally the relationship is not sufficiently proximate. Each solicitor is entitled to expect that the other party will look to his own solicitor for advice and protection. [32] It is almost inconceivable that a lawyer could owe a duty of care to a third person against whom his or her client is litigating.9 [33] In this case, EP was not engaged in litigation. He was not representing BR or a...