Search Results

1. BF v CV LCRO 271 / 2012 (6 September 2013) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...the Practitioner attended the hospital (Mr BF and other family members being present) at which time Mr BF questioned the 2 Practitioner about the status of the family home in relation to asset testing and in connection with on-going healthcare needs for his father. The Complaint [4] Mr BF’s complaint was that the Practitioner appeared not to have the knowledge to deal with requests for advice sought at that time; that the Practitioner failed to refer the family to a coll...

2. NE v RL LCRO 88/2013 (27 February 2015) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...unsatisfactory conduct as defined by sections 12 (a) and (b) of the Act. A ‘reasonably 5 Notice of hearing (1 November 2012). 6 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3. 7 Rule 7.1. 8 Rule 9. 9 Rules 13 and 13.3. 10 Rule 13. 11 At the time of the review hearing a decision from this Office on review of a complaint by the expert witness against Mr SA was the subject to an applicatio...

3. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust (2008) 88 Taupo 63 (88 TPO 62) [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...conduct per section 73 of the Trustee Act 1956. The trustees had acted with an honest and sincere belief on advice that the steps they were taking were both appropriate and lawful. They now acknowledge that they acted in breach of trust and have carefully considered the negative findings made against them in the 30 July 2008 judgment. It was appropriate therefore that relief be granted to the trustees accordingly. [9] FOlllthly, given the previous submission, there was no impediment t...

4. [2025] NZREADT 25 – ZA v REAA 2204 & DU (14 July 2025) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...tenant, which had included an adjoining space.22 She made the error in listing the property on the website, an error which then found its way into the lease. [61] This might be regarded as careless. It is arguable the licensee should have carefully checked such a critical fact, particularly before inserting it into the lease. The failure to do so might establish a lack of skill, care and diligence, in breach of r 5.1. This is possibly the additional element elevating the errone...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 029 Cable Bay Wines Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...land unit". Policy 2 limits the range of non-rural and non­ residential activities to avoid adverse effects on landscape and the general amenity of the area. Policy 4 emphasises the need for buildings to be small scale as a further means of protecting natural character and landscape values within the land unit. [93] We have examined the effects of extensive use of the lawn area for functions, informal dining, drinking and associated activities. The evidence supports a conclus...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - Ngāpuhi Mandate Inquiry report - prepublication version [pdf, 905 KB]

   T h e N g ā p u h i M a N d a T e i N q u i r y r e p o r T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 5 W a i 2 4 9 0 T h e N

7. Waitangi Tribunal - Ngāpuhi Mandate Inquiry report [pdf, 905 KB]

   T h e N g ā p u h i M a N d a T e i N q u i r y r e p o r T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 5 W a i 2 4 9 0 T h e N

8. [2007] NZEmpC AC 10/07 X v Auckland DHB [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...counsel on a compact disk. The letter continued: ADHB is not willing to advise how it became aware of the images. It does not consider the way in which the matter came to ADHB’s attention to be relevant. Furthermore, ADHB has obligations to protect staff from bullying, intimidation and harassment. In the event that you consider the way in which the information came to ADHB’s attention to be material, we would be grateful if you would advise us and we will endeavour t...

9. Joint Application to Make a New Parenting Order by Consent [pdf, 603 KB]

   PAGE 1Joint Application to Make a New Parenting Order by ConsentV1 July 2019 G U ID E The purpose of this form Use this form if you and all other ‘interested parties’ (any parent, guardian, person named on an existing Order or has care and/or contact responsibilities of the child(ren)) have reached agreement about arrangements for day to day care and/or contact of the child(ren) and you want the court to make a Parenting Order by consent. Who should fill in this form? This form must b...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 058 Barnhill Corporate Trustee v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 995 KB]

    ...capacity ratings? (e) should an 80 ha minimum lot size regime remain for all areas outside the Precinct rated to have Very Low, Low and Moderate-Low capacity or just LCU 1 and LCU 20? (f) do QLDC’s Pol 24.2.1.1 and other policies adequately protect against cumulative landscape character degradation? (g) how should new Pols 24.2.1.1A and 24.2.1.1B be framed for remaining WBRAZ areas? (h) should Pols 24.2.1.11 and 24.2.1.14 apply to areas rated with Moderate-High or High lan...