5384 items matching your search terms
Immigration and Protection Tribunal Annual Report 2021/2022 Judge Martin Treadwell Chair December 2022 2 Introduction The Immigration and Protection Tribunal was established under section 217 of the Immigration Act 2009 (the Act). Section 224A of the Act requires the Chair of the Tribunal to provide an annual report to the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Immig...
Immigration and Protection Tribunal Annual Report 2022/2023 Judge Martin Treadwell Chair December 2023 2 Introduction The Immigration and Protection Tribunal was established under section 217 of the Immigration Act 2009 (the Act). Section 224A of the Act requires the Chair of the Tribunal to provide an annual report to the Minister of Justice, the Minister of...
...Authority’s or the Court’s decision about the absence of justification may give him grounds to seek to stay in New Zealand, albeit with other employment. That will ultimately be a matter for the Minister of Immigration and/or the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. [50] Next, although Mr Goel may be opposed adamantly, and on principle, to providing expert evidence of his state of psychiatric health, he should not be deprived of the opportunity to argue, as he wishes, that his...
...Alternatively, she suggested that matter may be suitable for an applicant only hearing. [46] After considering the submissions, I concluded that the review was suitable for determination on the papers and the parties were advised accordingly. [47] Having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the application for review, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision [2023] NZEnvC 124 IN THE MA TIER of appeals under cl 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource :tvfanagement Act 1991 BETWEEN AND PO\'{IERCO LIMITED (ENV-2017 -\'v'LG-000060) TRANSPOWER NE\V ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2017-WLG-000064) (ENV-2021-\'v'LG-000025) Appellants MANA\VATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge L J Semple sitting alone under s 279
.............................................................................................. 26 WAS SHINGLE AND SHAKE ROOFING LIMITED (SSRL) NEGLIGENT? . 29 WAS MR BURROWS NEGLIGENT WHEN INSPECTING THE PROPERTY AND ISSUING THE PRODUCER STATEMENT? ....................................... 30 DID ROGER FRANKS OWE THE CLAIMANTS A DUTY OF CARE? IF SO HAS HE BREACHED THAT DUTY OF CARE? ........................................... 34 DOES MR KARL GAENSICKE (KARL) OWE THE CLAIMANTS A DUTY OF C...
...penalties of suspension have routinely been imposed by the Tribunal in cases involving instances of deception and falsification of documents by lawyers. (f) The only significant factor is Mr Morrison’s previously unblemished record in his lengthy career. [5] Mr Collins submitted that, as the seriousness of the conduct is the starting point in consideration of the relevant factors, the Tribunal must consider that the falsification of the Deed was not a minor or incidental matter....
...understanding of the outcome of the complaint. (b) Subject to any overriding duty to the Court, a lawyer's duty is to his or her client not the person on the other side of the dispute. (c) Mr [RN]’s duty was to his own client. He had no duty to protect and promote the interests of Mr [AT] or Mr [EC]. (d) Mr [RN] had been retained to consider his client's position, in the context of the available facts and the relevant law, to set out the legal position as he saw it and to...
...containing the mandatory items specified in the Code. The agreement sets out such critical matters as the services to be performed and the fees. It also provides notification to the client of the professional Code and the complaints process. It protects not just the client, but the adviser as well. [53] I uphold the fourth head of complaint. Mr Joseph is in breach of cl 18(a) of the Code. (5) Failing to maintain copies of all written communications between himself, the compl...
...decision maker considers it either necessary or desirable to do so, it inevitably follows that applicants are required to provide explanation of their circumstances. [60] The evidential burden on applicants should not, consistent with the consumer protection focus of the Act, be unduly onerous, but nor should the burden be negligible. [61] An applicant’s failure to lodge their application in time must be demonstrably linked to circumstances which, examined reasonably and carefully,...