Search Results

1. National and Auckland Standards Committees v Orlov [2015] NZLCDT 3 [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...submissions Mr Orlov ranged over a number of topics which were helpfully summarised for us by Mr Hodge in his submissions in reply, as follows: 1. No public purpose is served by the charges being heard. 2. The charges do not relate to public protection. 3. The charges are “incomprehensible” and unsupported by evidence. 4. These sorts of charges are not normally brought against practitioners. 5. Delay. 6. Insufficient time to prepare. [6] We preface our remarks about each o...

2. Complaint Assessment Committee 403 v Licensee B [2017] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...occupations is not to punish the practitioner for misbehaviour, although it may have that effect, but to ensure appropriate standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned. [11] The principal purpose of the Act is to “promote and protect the interests of consumers in respect of transactions that relate to real estate and to promote public 3 Substantive decision, at [73]. 4 Substantive decision, at [74]. 5...

3. [2021] NZREADT 02 - Anonymised Appellant (18 January 2021) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...agreement and the renewal agreement. [c] a breach of s 132 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, by failing to provide [the appellant] with a copy of the amendment agreement. Penalty principles [12] The purpose of the Act is to “promote and protect the interests of consumers in respect of transactions that relate to real estate and to promote public confidence in the performance of real estate agency work”.2 The Act achieves its purpose by regulating agents, branch m...

4. [2025] NZREADT 44 - OP v REAA (29 October 2025) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...property. The complainant’s photos do not evidence the contrary, in any material respect. It is notable that no complaint has been made by the buyer concerning misleading advertising. [50] As for the complainant’s access, he was subject to a protection order and not allowed onto the property (though he says the prohibition only applied while NN was present). It will not have been the licensees who prohibited his access. That will have been a matter for NN and her solicitor...

5. [2023] NZEnvC 007 Ravenswood Developments Limited v Waimakariri Distrrict Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...defined role within the District. This policy is based on a community expectation that the management of resources within distinctive environments is necessary even at this scale to provide for the wellbeing, health and safety of the community, and to protect and enhance the natural and physical resources. As a result of its research and community consultation the Council considers it is possible to identify areas of different amenity values, environmental qualities, form and fun...

6. PC8 Urban Common Bundle - Volume 2 [pdf, 7.6 MB]

   NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENT for Freshwater Management 2014 Updated August 2017 to incorporate amendments from the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Amendment Order 2017 CB0465 2 Contents Preamble 4 Review 6 Title

7. Federated-Farmers-of-New-Zealand.pdf [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...Objective 2 Objective 2 measures progress as the short-term numeric water quality values in Table 3.11-1 being “met” no later than 10 Amend Objective 2 as follows: Progress is made over the life of this Plan towards the restoration and protection of the health and Support in part Oppose in part Federated Farmers is interested in this appeal point so as to ensure that any outcomes are consistent with the years after PC1 is made operative. Policy 8(a) seeks collect...

8. Gibbs v Te Runanga o Ngati Tama - Part Lot 2 and Lot 1 DP 4866 (TNK 4/901) and Section 1 SO 10359 CT TNK4/792 (2011) 274 Aotea MB 47 (274 AOT 47) [pdf, 370 KB]

   GIBBS V TE RUNANGA O NGATI TAMA MLC 274 Aotea MB 47 [26 October 2011] IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 274 Aotea MB 47 (274 AOT 47) A20040005718 A20070011279 UNDER Section 338(2), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Lot 2 & Lot 1 DP 4866 (TNK 4/901) and Section 1 SO 10359 CT TNK 4/792 BETWEEN RUSSELL GIBBS AND PARANI GIBBS Applicants AND TE RUNANGA O NGATI TAMA First Respondent AND NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT COUNCI

9. Recommendations recap - issue 14 [pdf, 891 KB]

   ...https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/national-sudi-prevention-programme-launched 22 devices such as wahakura or pēpipods to families identified as needing them during the baby’s first year of life. A range of other evidence-based risk and protective factors will be incorporated into the national prevention programme. These include encouraging immunisation, breastfeeding, and sleeping baby on their back. As part of this investment, in 2017, a further $2 million was put into...

10. Proactive release – Remuneration Authority Legislation Bill [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    ...Richard Tait, plus independent director Hilary Poole. Disclaimer This Report has been prepared solely for the purposes stated herein and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no duty of care to any third party in connection with the provision of this Report. We accept no liability of any kind to any third party and disclaim all responsibility for the consequences of any third party acting or refraining to act in relian...