Search Results

1. CJARS-claim-form-Jan24.pdf [pdf, 530 KB]

   ...A witness or you assisted in the administration of justice. For example: • You reported a crime or gave information to the police in a criminal case that is punishable by imprisonment; and • you suffered material loss or damage to property and you are not in a Witness Protection Programme; or • you are in a close relationship with a witness and you experienced costs or suffered losses as a result of assisting or caring for the witness. Important information 1. Please print in CAPIT...

2. Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Social Assistance Legislation (Accommodation Supplement and Income-related Rent) Amendment Bill [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...households that receive income from rent when calculating assistance. 6. The Bill amends these principal Acts and associated regulations: a. Public and Community Housing Management Act 1992 (PACHMA) b. Social Security Act 2018 (SSA) c. Residential Care and Disability Support Services Act 2018. Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 27 - Right to Justice 7. Section 27(1) of the Bill of Rights Act provides that every person has the right to the observance o...

3. 2013 Decisions of public interest

   ...transfer his employment to the defendant pursuant to subpart 1 of Part 6A and secondly the determination of the terms and conditions of the plaintiff's employment if he was so entitled. The Court held that it was clear that Part 6A was intended to provide protection for limited categories of employees providing a particular type of service, but was not persuaded that the plaintiff fell within that category. The Court thus held that the plaintiff was not an employee who was entitled to elect to...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Decisions of public interest

4. [2019] NZEnvC 050 Palmerston North Airport Limited v Palmerston North City Council [pdf, 4 MB]

   ...proximity of a large portion of the industrial area to residential areas, and an extensive interface between these areas, it will be necessary to control the effects of industrial land use and development to ensure that an appropriate level of amenity protection is afforded to adjacent residential areas. In 2008, the Napier Road Industrial Precinct (as shown on Structure Plan 12.1) and the Midhurst Street Industrial Areas (as shown in Structure Plan 7.4) were specifically developed to meet...

5. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust (2008) 87 Taupo MB 107 (87 TPO 107) [pdf, 14 MB]

   ...is disposed of by regulation 32(1) of the Maori Assembled Owners Regulations 1995. If this is the test then no meeting of the owners of the tJ1.lst will in practice be able to pass a valid resolution. That said, the trustees are entitled to have careful regard to the wishes of the owners as expressed at owners meetings. One of the requirements in exercising a distributive filllction is that the trustees must be informed and so the meeting of owners had a very imp0I1ant practical eff...

6. Wynn-Parke & Anor v CAC20008 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 8 [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...With regard to clause 28 of the Conditions of Sale, he insisted that he said that “if” the existing lease were to be cancelled, he understood that AT would issue a new lease to the successful bidder of the freehold property. [60] Mr Hewes was carefully cross-examined by all parties or their counsel. Under cross-examination by Mr Wilson he insisted that, at all times, he followed the advice he was given by Bell Gully which, inter alia, was that AT intended to cancel the lease and r...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 54 Goel v Director-General for Primary Industries [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...Authority’s or the Court’s decision about the absence of justification may give him grounds to seek to stay in New Zealand, albeit with other employment. That will ultimately be a matter for the Minister of Immigration and/or the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. [50] Next, although Mr Goel may be opposed adamantly, and on principle, to providing expert evidence of his state of psychiatric health, he should not be deprived of the opportunity to argue, as he wishes, that his...

8. LCRO 131/2022 GN, YL and EK v FQ (30 June 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...Alternatively, she suggested that matter may be suitable for an applicant only hearing. [46] After considering the submissions, I concluded that the review was suitable for determination on the papers and the parties were advised accordingly. [47] Having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the application for review, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that...

9. [2023] NZEnvC 124 PowerCo Ltd v Manawatu District Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision [2023] NZEnvC 124 IN THE MA TIER of appeals under cl 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource :tvfanagement Act 1991 BETWEEN AND PO\'{IERCO LIMITED (ENV-2017 -\'v'LG-000060) TRANSPOWER NE\V ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2017-WLG-000064) (ENV-2021-\'v'LG-000025) Appellants MANA\VATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Judge L J Semple sitting alone under s 279

10. Strickland v Gaensicke [2011] NZWHT Auckland 46 [pdf, 273 KB]

    .............................................................................................. 26 WAS SHINGLE AND SHAKE ROOFING LIMITED (SSRL) NEGLIGENT? . 29 WAS MR BURROWS NEGLIGENT WHEN INSPECTING THE PROPERTY AND ISSUING THE PRODUCER STATEMENT? ....................................... 30 DID ROGER FRANKS OWE THE CLAIMANTS A DUTY OF CARE? IF SO HAS HE BREACHED THAT DUTY OF CARE? ........................................... 34 DOES MR KARL GAENSICKE (KARL) OWE THE CLAIMANTS A DUTY OF C...