Search Results

1. BORA Parliament Bill [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...Zealand’s constitutional arrangements. Parliament is a unique environment in which long-standing democratic principles have been, and must continue to be, upheld. This includes enabling public access and participation, and ensuring that constitutional protections are maintained (e.g., Parliamentary Privilege). 9. This context must be taken into account when considering whether this legislation is consistent with the Bill of Rights Act. Section 14 – Freedom of expression 10. Secti...

2. Singh v Golian [2017] NZIACDT 14 (12 September 2017) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...considerable amount in doing so. Because the complaint and the appeal to the IPT were both entirely without foundation, the potential for serious harm to the complainant and his wife was significant. For that reason, the adviser had a duty to very carefully weigh the circumstances before pursuing the appeal and the complaint. The risks of the strategy were 13 far greater than simply not being successful with the complaint and the appeal. [56] I have already expresse...

3. LCRO 18/2020 MP v LT (31 August 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...basis of all information available if the LCRO considers that the review can be adequately determined in the absence of the parties. [30] The parties have agreed to the review being dealt with on the papers. 6 [31] I record that having carefully read the complaint, the response to the complaint, the Committee’s decision and the submissions filed in support of and in opposition to the application for review, there are no additional issues or questions in my mind that necess...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 205 Cossens v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 14 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 205 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act JOHN COSSENS (ENV-2017 -CHC-079) Appellant QUEENSTOWN-LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: at Queenstown on 1 and 2 August 2018 Final submissions received 12 September 2018 Appearance

5. Herman, Wang, Howatt, Li, Thornhill, Gilchrist, Barnao, Watson v CAC10100 & Jackman [2012] NZREADT 60 [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...lustre and, therefore, market value to the property in order to enrich the agent and the vendor at the expense of the buyer. It is put that such advertisement is a breach of Rule 6.4 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2009 which prohibits licensees from misleading customers or clients, or providing false information, or withholding information which should by law or fairness be provided to a customer or client. [14] Mr Barnao accepts that Pate...

6. [2007] NZEmpC AC 15/07 Gates v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...The Court of Appeal, in the case referred to by Mr Thompson, A S McLauchlan Ltd v MEL Network Ltd (2002) 16 PRNZ 747, stated that the discretion is not to be fettered by constructing “principles” from previously decide cases. The Court must carefully assess the circumstances of a particular case, noting that where a plaintiff is unable to meet an adverse order for substantial security this may in effect prevent the plaintiff from pursuing the claim. The Court of Appeal stated:...

7. Mason v REAA Registrar [2013] NZREADT 35 [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...if there had been no offending. Certainly, that is how we have treated that situation. He said that if a real estate salesperson’s licence could be granted to him he would be willing to be closely supervised for six months or so. [24] We have carefully reconsidered the views we set out in our said decision of 23 January 2013 together with the further information and advantage of viva voce evidence on 26 March 2013. 5 [25] We accept that the applicant has many talents, pe...

8. CAC 10044 v He [2011] NZREADT 9 [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...investigator. Penalty [13] The defendant was asked if he wished to make any submissions as to penalty and he declined. Mr Hodge has submitted that decisions of industry disciplinary Tribunals emphasise the maintenance of high standards and the protection of the public above any punitive element although orders made in disciplinary proceedings may have a punitive effect. http://www.skykiwi.com/ http://www.skykiwi.com/ http://www.skykiwi.com/ 4 [14] In this regard M...

9. Baker v High Court (Costs) [2022] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 696 KB]

   ...her statement of claim in the Tribunal the plaintiff first filed with the Human Rights Commission a complaint that she believed she had been subjected to victimisation and discrimination by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue for being a part-time carer of the plaintiff’s child. [9.3] By email dated 10 June 2021 the Commission explained to the plaintiff that the terms of HRA, s 79(3) prevented the Commission from offering its dispute resolution service: I write in response to your com...

10. I Ltd v V Ltd [2024] NZDT 97 (18 January 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...out the tattoo and has used the photographs. 4. I Ltd claims $3,561.15, being: the cost of photoshopping ($953.35); legal fees ($747.50); a refund of the $900 paid to V Ltd; the cost of flying OB to and from [City 1] ($552.60); waxing and skin care ($58.00); the taxi from the airport ($37.60); nail care costs ($72.10); accommodation ($240). Issues 5. The issues for the Tribunal to determine are: (a) Whether V Ltd engaged in misleading conduct; (b) If so, whether I Ltd is...