Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 056 New Zealand Cherry Corp (Leyser) LP v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   ...Area and an explanation is included. 4.2.1 Outstanding Natural Landscapes and Outstanding Natural Features The District contains a number of outstanding natural landscapes and outstanding natural features that require identification and protection from inappropriate subdivision, use and development. In determining what is inappropriate subdivision, use and development in these landscapes it must be recognised that these landscapes are often utilised by people and commun...

2. Grants Handbook v4.89 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...7(1)(a) - (d) or (f) - (o) of the Act • hearings before the District Court, Family Court, High Court, Court of Appeal or Supreme Court • an application in a Youth Court under Part 7 of the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, (child or young person in care of the chief executive of a social or cultural service agency) or for the review of a determination or order made by a Youth Court in proceedings of that type • a claim to be heard by the Waitangi Tribunal • a claim to be heard befor...

3. LA - Provider manual - Part 1 [pdf, 523 KB]

   ...Criminal Proceedings Clause 6 Duty lawyer Clause 7 Police Detention Legal Assistance Clause 8 Civil Clause 9 Family Clause 10 Māori Land/Māori Appellate Courts Clause 11 Waitangi Tribunal Clause 12 Mental Health Clause 13 Refugees and Protected Persons Clause 14 Court of Appeal and Supreme Court In this chapter This chapter contains the following sections: Section See Page Application requirements 19 Approval types 20 Criteria for approval – all applicants 21...

4. Mr-Rasheeds-Submissions-of-37-Families.pdf [pdf, 619 KB]

   ........... 23 ISSUE 8 WHY DID THE HOSPITAL NOT REPORT THE FIREARM INJURY THE TERRORIST PRESENTED WITH IN JULY 2018? ................................................................................................................. 25 ISSUES 48, 50 AND 52 PROTECTION OF MOSQUES; INSTITUTIONAL BIAS AGAINST MUSLIMS; TOO MUCH FOCUS BY INTELLIGENCE SERVICES ON ISLAMIC TERRORISTS? .................................................. 25 ISSUE 49 CAPACITY DEFICIENCY IN TRACKING LONE ACTORS .............

5. E77 CVA - Ngāti Paoa Iwi Trust [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...aspire to revitalise the practice and application of our 2346 37 mātauranga and tikanga across our tribal rohe. The land and seascapes which attracted our Ngāti Paoa ancestors to Tāmaki Makaurau and which draws people today, require careful management to protect the vulnerable natural resources which are intertwined with cultural heritage values. Ngāti Paoa would therefore like to see a partnership formalised with Panuku whereby protection and management of these resou...

6. Evaluation of Family Mediation pilot [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...between the mediator, parties, lawyer for child, children (by agreement), third parties (also by agreement), followed by a report to the court. Family mediation tried to assist parties to develop their own solutions in relation to their children’s care; to resolve disputes faster; and to provide for the participation of children in the decision-making process. This study was undertaken to enable the Ministry of Justice to identify any implementation issues, assess the costs of the pilot, an...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 161 Eden Epsom Residential Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   Eden Epsom Residential Protection Society Incorporated v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 161 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14(1) of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 against a decision on Private Plan Change 21 to the Auckland Unitary Plan BETWEEN EDEN-EPSOM RESIDENTIAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2020-AKL-079) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Resp...

8. LCRO 193/2017 AA v BB and CC (29 November 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...and Ms CC as: (a) threats and torts with no legal right or authority to be in possession of private, confidential privileged communications with an entity they had never represented; and (b) knowingly and wittingly breaking the complainant’s protected disclosure status and confidentiality; and (c) committing perjury; and (d) coercing witnesses; and 4 (e) knowingly assisting in the preparation of false and perjured submissions. [16] Mr AA attached to his review applicatio...

9. Berry v Rondel LCRO 130 / 2011 (2 February 2012) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...gave rise to a conflict of interest whereby Mr Rondel should have declined to act for Ms Berry 2) Mr Rondel did not obtain Ms Berry’s informed consent in terms of Rule 6.1.1 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008. 3) Mr Rondel did not provide Ms Berry with the information required to be provided by him pursuant to Rules 3.4 and 3.5. 4) Mr Rondel did not advise Ms Berry as to the terms of the Agreements or seek her instructions to var...

10. AN v TC LCRO 381/2013 (4 August 2015) [pdf, 88 KB]

    ...you have run out of time. I still need time to check and approve the section 21A Agreement, and on the basis of earlier documentation you have provided for other clients, I could not imagine that it would have been drafted appropriately or fairly, protecting both parties’ interests in these circumstances. I suggest that you forward me the draft and I will check it over on my return and get back to you ASAP in the week commencing 8 July next. [4] Mr TC’s response was: Your...