UW v EP LCRO 146/2011 (31 March 2015) [pdf, 77 KB]
...issues were coming to an end. (f) [Law Firm] was not instructed to act by [Company], but by the company’s receivers. (g) The firm did not refuse to complete any ongoing instructions or retainer. (h) [Law Firm]’s ethics committee had given careful consideration to the issue of potential conflict, and concluded that there was no impediment to the firm acting for the receivers. 4 (i) [Law Firm] did not have good cause to refuse the receivers’ instructions. (j) Mr UW h...