Burn v CAC 20002 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 25 [pdf, 144 KB]
...settled the purchase. [16] Mr Burn says that it was not until 21 March 2011 that he was aware that there was no permit for the deck. He asserts that there should have been a condition in the agreement for sale and purchase prepared by the licensee to protect Mr and Mrs Burn over the deck. Accordingly, he maintains the licensee has been guilty of misconduct or at least unsatisfactory conduct. 5 [17] His stance is that the vendor and the licensee “were fully aware that the...