Search Results

1. Te-Manutukutuku-Issue-79.pdf [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...the day to pursue its preferred policy of corporatising State­owned forestry assets. Under the agreement, the Government could sell the cutting rights to Crown forest land under new forestry licences. In exchange, Māori received an additional protection for their well­founded claims relating to Crown forest land : they could seek an interim recommendation from the Tribunal that the land be returned to Māori ownership, and that recom­ mendation would become binding on the Crown...

2. BOAC v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 50-57 [pdf, 357 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2010-100-32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 and 57 BETWEEN BOAC Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND HUGHES & TUKE CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND DAVID CHARLES TUKE Third Respondent AND DAVID B MCGLASHAN Fourth Respondent AND RRL GROUP LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND BARRY RUSSELL BROWN (Undischarged Bankrupt) Si

3. LCRO 224/2018 (31 October 2019) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...[98] In giving consideration as to whether it is appropriate to order a penalty, I refer to the guidance provided by the High Court which has stated that the “predominant purposes [of orders] are to advance the public interest (which include “protection of the public”), to maintain professional standards, to impose sanctions on a practitioner for breach of his/her duties, and to provide scope for rehabilitation in appropriate cases”.23 [99] I have concluded that in these part...

4. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Harper [2020] NZLCDT 29 (11 September 2020) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...8 Deliu v The National Standards Committee and the Auckland Standards Committee No. 1 of The New Zealand Law Society [2017] NZHC 2318 (25 September 2017). 15 How to Achieve the Purposes of Penalty in This Case [44] Protection of the public – it is conceded by the prosecutor in this matter that “all indicators suggest repetition is unlikely”. We have already stated that we do not consider that Ms Harper, whom many colleagues and clients have endorsed

5. [2019] NZREADT 54 - Houliston v CAC 1901, Lohmann & Webb (10 December 2019) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...Summit, Mr Nalder, and so he advised Mr Webb that he would be dealing directly thereafter with the Authority. [12] The complaint which Mr Houliston made to the Authority was that: [a] Mr Lohmann breached s 136 of the Act; [b] Mr Webb failed to protect Mr Houliston throughout the sales process and failed to disclose Mr Lohmann's “conflict of interest”; [c] the licensees had misled Mr Houliston about whether or not there was a competing party who was intending to make an...

6. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burcher [2019] NZLCDT 12 [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...to comment that such approach was consistent with the legislative purposes of the Act to protect consumers of legal services: “I also take into account the fact that the Lawyer’s (sic) and Conveyancers Act 2006 is at least in part a consumer protection measure. It would defeat that purpose if the legislation were interpreted to exclude from its scope functions which a lawyer routinely undertakes alongside the provision of legal services but these were not considered to be regulated...

7. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML evidence chief Pita Rikys [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...impacts on Maori cultural values broadly, and in relation to Matiatia Bay specifically, are minor at best. In regard to Archaeological sites specifically I adopt and support the conclusions reached by Prince in his evidence and the management and protection measures that he proposes. Cultural Values 11. Maori Cultural values are an expression and articulation of the Maori world view (Te Ao Maori / the Maori World) and identity, contain a spiritual (wairau) dimension and in terms...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 30 Wills v Goodman Fielder NZ Ltd costs [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...for costs: Moore v McNabb. 8 I do not accept that this is the effect of that decision. What the Court of Appeal said in that case when discussing the applicable principles is: 9 … in fairness, defendants must have the means of gaining some protection from costs by making offers to settle by in some way meeting the claim. Plaintiffs should also have protection where defendants decline reasonable settlement offers. [20] I do not consider that the Court is precluded from cons...

9. Weber v CAC 20002 & Penrose & Brown's Real Estate [2013] NZREADT 83 [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...determining whether the Tribunal, or on appeal this court, should make an order prohibiting the publication of the report of the proceedings, requires consideration of the extent to which publication of the proceedings would provide some degree of protection to the public, the profession, or the Court. It is the public interest in that sense that must be weighed against the interests of other persons, including the practitioner, when exercising the discretion whether or not to prohibit p...

10. BORA Arms Amendment Bill (No 3) [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...safety may be at risk. We consider that such an objective is significant and important. A rational and proportional connection? 13. In considering whether the ex parte process is rationally and proportionately connected to the objective or protecting the public, we have taken into account two key considerations. Firstly, we consider that a distinction can be made between a decision that there are grounds for the order to be made and the order actually being made. The ability of...