Search Results

1. Director of Proceedings v Xu [2023] NZHRRT 30 [pdf, 554 KB]

   ...1. The plaintiff is the Director of Proceedings exercising statutory functions under sections 15 and 49 of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 (“the Act”). 2. At all material times the aggrieved person was a consumer of health care services. 3. At all material times the defendant, Mr Shengming (Steven) Xu (“Mr Xu”), a massage therapist, was a health care provider within the meaning of s 3 of the Act, and was providing health care services to the aggrieved p...

2. Ngati Pahauwera Affidavit on behalf of Trustees [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...this in 2012. 3. This application is made by the Trustees for recognition of Customary Marine Title and Protected Customary Rights under the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 (“the Takutai Moana Act”). We also seek wahi tapu protection as provided for in the Takutai Moana Act. NEW EVIDENCE 4. In 2013 the Trustees engaged a project manager, Bonny Hatami, to collect new affidavit and statement evidence from members of Ngati Pahauwera in support of this application....

3. OIA-96282.pdf [pdf, 18 MB]

   gen, Section (9 ) (2) (a) Section (9 ) (2 ) (a) Justice Cenlre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 contactus@justice.govt.nzIwww.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 96186 Tena koe - Official Information Act request: Victim Support Thank you for your email of 24 May 2022, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information related to Victim Support. I have outlined your specific requests and my response to each below (please

4. Tuumotooa v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 101 (01 October 2014) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...them) the Tribunal has prevented Ms Tangilanu from reapplying for a licence for two years. Those decisions explain why I do not consider rehabilitation is realistic. Those sanctions relating to Ms Tangilanu’s ability to hold a licence address the protection of the public and the desirability of rehabilitation. In relation to the other sanctions imposed, the orders excluding Ms Tangilanu from practising are taken into account as part of the matrix of penalties. 4 [14] Each...

5. Taueki v McMillan - Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Māori Reservation (2004) 148 Aotea MB 27 (148 AOT 27) [pdf, 642 KB]

   ...generations, according to their information. They also take umbrage Minute Book:148 AOT 29 at the suggestion that they have in some way failed in their duties both to the Beneficiaries and to the Court. On the contrary, in their view they have taken the care and protection of the Reservation to new heights with both local and national recognition for their efforts. They also consider the Applicant a self appointed kaitiaki with no mandate from either the Beneficiaries or the iwi. A nu...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 134 Strategic Property Advocacy Network v Auckland Council [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...156(1) of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 201 O STRATEGIC PROPERTY ADVOCACY NETWORK Appellant (ENV-2017-AKL-000167) AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED WAITAKERE RANGES PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED GM and J M YOUNG Section 27 4 parties Principal Environment Judge L J Newhook, sitting alone under s 279 of the Act In Chambers at Auckland Submissions: John Newick on behalf of the Strategic Property Advoca...

7. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 32 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...These were summarised in the decision of Daniels1 as follows: (a) The primary purpose is not punishment, although orders inevitably will have some such effect; (b) The predominant purpose is to protect the public interest, which includes the protection of the public; (c) To maintain professional standards; (d) To impose sanctions on a practitioner for breach of his/her standards; (e) To provide scope for rehabilitation in appropriate cases; (f) To carefully consider alternativ...

8. Kopa v Kopa – Kotuku B1 (1983) 62 Whangārei MB 182 (62 WH 182) [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...c011fir■at1oa: -J2fj lotab 11 C•f& ... 1'- • ,_rt IU Salw llr r P lrect, for llodl aU.wr/aliaee. - - - ----- ------ htMI' _. - tawwttOB. I lulft ,.noully perllUaded alleor to nta.111 • Uf• illter~.J u • ..-.ur• of protection f- coaUaned fOOd taniliij.- -- . . . /2 182 - -·-- ----~--- --·- . . - •·· - · . . . . ·····--···· ·· - . - --- ----- Court: ConfirMd order Sec 34(10) for 1-diate relea•• to Aaat. eo.. S/Duti•• at Whan...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 049 Haines House Haulage Northland v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 3.5 MB]

   ...application were not subject to Plan appeals, nor to any major changes through the mediation process. This relates in particular to RPE Objectives 1.2.1, .2, .3 and Policies 1.3.1 and 1.3.5. However, there has been the addition of a new Policy 1A to protect identified elements of the zone's distinctive rural character and amenity. [7] During the course of this hearing, the relevant Plan provisions were approved by the Court, and in any event all parties agreed these provisions co...

10. Rangahaua Whanui National Overview volume 2 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    NATIONAL OVERVIEW volume i i Professor Alan Ward Waitangi Tribunal Rangahaua Whanui Series WAITANGI TRIBUNAL 1997 A Waitangi Tribunal publication © Copyright Waitangi Tribunal 1997 isbn 1-86956-208-9 Edited and produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by GP Publications, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by GP Print, Wellington, New Zealand Set in Times Roman This report was commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui research programme. Any views expr