Search Results

1. CAC 20002 v Kitto [2013] NZREADT 70 [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...2012 the defendant appeared to deny the charge and appeal the decision of the Committee to prosecute, the defendant has since declined to participate further in this prosecution despite having been served with all papers as appropriate. [4] Much care has been taken to effect such service on her because she has been in custody since about 14 May 2013 when she was convicted of four separate frauds and sentenced to imprisonment for two years and three months. As those convictions involv...

2. CAC10017 v Xu [2013] NZREADT 16 [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...(ii) On 24 August 2007 the complainant entered into an agency listing agreement with the defendant to sell the property; 2 (iii) On 24 August 2007 the defendant had received interest in the property from potential purchasers Tauroa Age Care Limited (Tauroa) and York Yu; (iv) On 24 August 2007 the defendant presented the complainant with an offer from Tauroa to purchase the property for $650,000; (v) On 24 August 2007 the complainant entered into a conditional agreement wit...

3. Bisson - Succession to Alayna Waimana Clark - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 9015 (2021) 431 Aotea MB 107 (431 AOT 107) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...to the Trustees for the time being of the Maraina Kuratopi Trust, being an Ahu Whenua Trust constituted by the Maori Land Court on 5 August 1999, upon perpetual charitable trust to apply both capital and income for the provision of the respite care to or for the benefit of persons with an intellectual disability resident in Taranaki who are members of the hapu associated with the land or persons entitled to succeed as defined in section 108(2)(a) to (f) inclusive of the Act”....

4. CJ v XL LCRO 221 / 2010 (1 July 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...cancellation had not been effected, and that by excluding them the Respondent misled the Court. The Standards Committee decision [22] The determination of the Standards Committee on each of the matters is recorded as follows:- Stock … From a careful perusal of all the confidential paperwork that was made available by the practitioner, it was clear that the moment Ms [XL] became aware of the sale of some of the stock, the correct stock amounts were included in the proceedings...

5. Proactive release - Statutes Amendment Bill [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Medicines Act 1997; 5.2 Animal Products Act 1999; 5.3 Animal Welfare Act 1999; 5.4 Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009; 5.5 Biosecurity Act 1993; 5.6 Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Act 2019; 5.7 Care of Children Act 2004; 5.8 Courts Security Act 1999; 5.9 COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020; 5.10 Crown Entities Act 2004; 5.11 Crown Forest Assets Act 1989; 5.12 Customs and Excise Act 2018; 5.13 Dog Control Act 199...

6. Tweeddale v Pearson [2010] NZWHT Wellington 4 [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...of limiting their exposure to this risk. A claimant may avoid this risk by abstaining from taking legal proceedings; but a party who is sued has no such alternative. It follows that, in fairness, defendants must have the means of gaining some protection from costs by making offers to settle by in some way meeting the claim. Plaintiffs should also have protection where defendants decline reasonable settlement offers. [57] Then there are the “public” aspects of litigation. If...

7. [2014] NZEmpC 43 Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Limited Interlocutory [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...historically taken inability to pay into account as a discounting factor in assessing costs’ contributions (sometimes to nil) at a post litigation phase. That may lead to an unintended double- pincer effect on defendants, reducing their ability to protect their costs exposure and allowing litigants to proceed with claims with no ability to contribute to costs if their 5 [2011] NZEmpC 89 at [13]. 6 See, for example, Miller v Thomp...

8. IJ v SO LCRO 76 / 2011 (15 February 2012) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...guardian; appeared to have misled her client; had a conflict of interest; and had caused unnecessary legal expense for the Applicant. 2 [3] The Practitioner, acting for Age Concern, filed an application to the Court for orders under the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 (PPPR) in respect of the Applicant’s mother, Mrs G. [4] Orders were sought for the appointment of a welfare guardian and property manager. The proposed appointee for welfare guar...

9. LCRO 197/2017 SM v HW (29 March 2019) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...[Ms SM] and Mr JK separated in March 2016. [27] For these reasons, the Committee did not consider that Ms HW had a conflict of duties, and therefore had not contravened r 6.1 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the rules). 5 Application for review [28] Ms SM filed an application for review on 18 October 2017. She repeats her claim that Ms HW was aware of [Ms SM’s] relationship property dispute with Mr JK before Ms HW...

10. Frequently asked questions Victims trust and confidence in the criminal justice system [pdf, 217 KB]

    ...justice processes are is very important for driving trust and confidence in the CJS. Experiences that are perceived to be unfair can have a particularly damaging impact on trust and confidence. Some international research suggests that individuals care more about being treated fairly in justice processes than they care about the justice outcome they receive. Research shows that direct contact with the CJS can influence these perceptions. What people hear about others’ experiences...