Search Results

1. Data tables

   ...and people where name suppression was granted. View or download the name suppression data tables Family Court Family Court applications The number of substantive Family Court applications filed by case type. This includes more detailed information on Care of Children Act (excluding Hague) cases, such as parenting order applications filed without notice, and family violence cases. View or download the family court applications data tables Protection Order applications Information includes total...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data >
   3. Justice statistics

2. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Kwon [2025] NZLCDT 45 (11 November 2025) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...should he wish. [27] We also consider that our public protective function requires us to make an order under s 242(1)(g) that the practitioner not practise on his own account. Given Mr Kwon’s lack of insight, we have reached the view that only careful oversight of his day-to-day work will be sufficiently protective of future clients. [28] While we consider that a period of 12 months suspension is a proportionate period, we are prepared to overlap this with his previous period...

3. Technical report of Parenting Hearings programme pilot [pdf, 1 MB]

   The Parenting Hearings Programme Pilot: Evaluation Technical Report The Parenting Hearings Programme Pilot: Evaluation Technical Report Trish Knaggs and Anne Harland Research, Evaluation and Modelling Unit September 2009 2 The Parenting Hearings Programme Pilot: Evaluation Report - Technical Report Published September 2009 Ministry of

4. LCRO 9/2024 & 12/2024 QB v WF and SY & WF and SY v QB (27 June 2024) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...clients together as the respondents, to respondent Ms SY as “Ms X” and to respondent Mr WF as “Mr Y”. I will also refer to the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 as “the Act”, to the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 as “the Rules” and to the New Zealand Law Society as the NZLS. Background [4] The respondents worked for the same employer and in the same area of work. From mid-2015, the employer advised staff of a restructuring p...

5. Ōamaru Courthouse to be re-opened

   ...Waitaki Council will also be able to use the building outside court sitting hours for council-related activities, such as community meetings, civil defence and emergency situations, and other community purposes. “The sharing of the building will be done carefully so as to protect the confidentiality and security requirements of the court,” says Mr Gibbs. The Ōamaru Courthouse was closed in December 2011 after building inspections found it fell below minimum strength and safety standards. T...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. News & media archive >
   4. Media release archive

6. Yasin & Anor v Hammadieh Sanctions decision [2015] NZIACDT 4 (04 January 2015) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned.” [8] When imposing sanctions those statutory purposes require consideration of at least four factors which may materially bear upon maintaining appropriate standards of conduct: [8.1] Protecting the public: section 3 of the Act states “The purpose of this Act is to promote and protect the interests of consumers receiving immigration advice ...” [8.2] Demanding minimum standards of conduct: Dentice v Valuers Registrat...

7. Graves v CAC 2003 & Langdon [2012] NZREADT 41 [pdf, 32 KB]

   ...listing agreement which imposed unfair conditions on sellers to such an extent that the listing agreement is in breach of s.131 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (about right to cancel after 90 days) and r.9.12 of the Professional Conduct and Client Care Rules 2009 (an agency agreement is not to contain conditions which are not reasonably necessary to protect the interest of the agent). [6] The complainant included with his complaint a copy of an agreement dated 6 December 2010, enter...

8. Auckland Standards Committee v Castles [2014] NZLCDT 8 [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...previous disciplinary history “may demonstrate that the practitioner lacks insight into the causes and effects of such behaviour, suggesting an inability to correct it. This may indicate that striking off is the only effective means of ensuring protection of the public in the future.” [18] The Tribunal of five members unanimously reached the view that no penalty short of strike off could properly reflect the seriousness of this practitioner’s misconduct and ensure future prot...

9. CAC 20004 v Gardiner [2014] NZREADT 65 [pdf, 36 KB]

   ...executed and he would not therefore have needed to tell him to get rid of any stolen property had he stolen it. He said that he had been annoyed by Miss Dufty’s boys’ behaviour for many years. He said his concern was as a stepfather to try and protect his stepson from the potential discovery of cannabis, not to prevent the Police from finding any stolen property. 3 [7] Mr McCoubrey and Mr Waymouth both agree that the test as to whether or not the sending of the text amounts...

10. REAA CAC 10054 v Hume [2014] NZREADT 10 [pdf, 82 KB]

    ...that he reacts to issues belligerently and unprofessionally, and obsessively insists on what he regards as his rights.” [17] It is well established that decisions of disciplinary Tribunals should emphasise the maintenance of high standards and the protection of the public through specific and general deterrence. While this may result in orders having a punitive effect, this is not their purpose; Z v CAC [2009] 1 NZLR 2; CAC v Walker [2011] NZREADT 4. [18] We accept that, given the...