Auckland Standards Committee v Castles [2014] NZLCDT 8 [pdf, 77 KB]
...previous disciplinary history “may demonstrate that the practitioner lacks insight into the causes and effects of such behaviour, suggesting an inability to correct it. This may indicate that striking off is the only effective means of ensuring protection of the public in the future.” [18] The Tribunal of five members unanimously reached the view that no penalty short of strike off could properly reflect the seriousness of this practitioner’s misconduct and ensure future prot...