Search Results

1. [2018] NZLCDT 4 Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Ellis [pdf, 398 KB]

   ...stated under cross-examination: “… I really don’t know when he put his lawyer’s hat on, when he take it off. I can’t tell.”16 [29] H L stated that when Mr Ellis referred to having a conflict of interest, it was for the purpose of “protecting himself”, rather than of assisting her.17 She was not sufficiently informed of what was occurring to understand the risks to her or her company. “Not 100% sure. I know the lawyer tried to protect himself for that but I don�€...

2. IAA v Maerean [2013] NZIACDT 6 (07 February 2013) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...However, if he was in the Philippines at the time, he would sign them with the client. [29] The Registrar particularised the grounds of the complaint against Ms Maerean. In summary these were: [29.1] Breaches of the Code of Conduct’s requirements of care, respect, diligence and professionalism. [29.2] Providing misleading information to Immigration New Zealand, thereby breaching the Act, the Immigration Act 2009 and Immigration New Zealand’s operating requirements (by representin...

3. ENV-2018-AKL-000149 Fulton Hogan Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...Environment Court “need not be troubled with issues of jurisdiction”, but rather that it “must assess whether the Council approved version of the SEA policy 1 Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v Auckland Council [2018] NZHC 1069. 2 Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc v Auckland Council [2018] NZHC 1344. 2 matrix, including restricted discretionary activity s...

4. [2013] NZEmpC 234 Gazeley v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...DHB) to audit Woodlands, carried out a spot surveillance audit on the facility. This was critical of Mrs Gazeley’s management of Woodlands. The following day, the DHB exercised its powers under art 22.2 of the Age-related Residential Care Services Agreement to place Woodlands under temporary management. [4] Mrs Gazeley was on annual leave when these events occurred. When she returned from leave she was suspended without notice from her employment. Oceania then comm...

5. Family violence and sexual violence work programme archived updates

   ...increases the likelihood of criminal offending.” Most criminal offenders have themselves been targets of violence: 80% of child and youth offenders have experience of family violence 87% of young offenders aged 14-16 years in 2016/17 had prior care and protection reports 75% of women in prison have reported family violence and sexual violence A history of sexual abuse is the strongest predictor of reoffending by young females. “Over the past 10-15 years there have been numerous calls for...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Key initiatives >
   3. Addressing family violence and sexual violence >
   4. Work programme

6. DA v EB LCRO 7/2013 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...had given to Ms EB as being either $10,682.76 from Ms DA made out to CR. 8 or $10,628.76,9 [11] The Costs Assessor considered the total of Ms DA’s fees against the reasonable fee factors set out in Rule 9 and 9.1 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules, and Ms EB’s unmet expectation that she should receive a refund closer to $13,000. 10 concluded that her fees were excessive, and should have been between $10,000 and $15,000 including GST. It appeared to the Costs Assessor...

7. Domestic violence programme evaluation report [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...thought to better support offenders’ good engagement and uptake of non-violence programmes. In contrast, the referral process is conducted remotely in the Family Court, with no equivalent face-to-face meeting with an officer of the court due to most protection orders being made without notice. In 2016/17, about one in five of those who attended an assessment did not result in them starting a non-violence programme. While not all of those for whom assessments are undertaken may be e...

8. Victims of crime in the adult criminal justice system: a stocktake of the literature [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ................................................................................35 4.5 Stocktake summary ................................................................................................37 5 State responses – victims’ rights and standards of care ............................ 38 5.1 Victims’ rights .........................................................................................................38 5.1.1 Moral or legal rights? ................................

9. Evaluation of Parenting Through Separation programme [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...Parenting Through Separation materials 56 4.7 Suggested changes in the Parenting Through Separation programme 57 4.8 Summary 59 5 Parents prior to attending a Parenting Through Separation course 61 5.1 Characteristics of parent sample and current childcare arrangements 61 5.2 What parents want from the Parenting Through Separation course 65 5.3 Parent and child needs after separation 67 5.4 Child behaviour after separation 70 5.5 Summary 71 Evaluation of the ‘Parenting Through Sepa...

10. Turner v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 36 [pdf, 327 KB]

    ...Plans, and if so, Was his Negligence Causative of Loss?.................................................................... 17 What was the Role Of Capstone? What was the Role of Mr Donaldson? ... 26 Did Capstone or Mr Donaldson Breach a Duty Of Care Owed to the Claimants and if so, Was this Causative of Loss? ....................................... 31 Liability Finding - Capstone ....................................................................... 32 Liability Finding - Mr Dona...