Search Results

1. Appendix-4_Peter-Kinley_-s87F-Report_Flooding-and-Hydrology_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 1 MB]

   .................................. 12 Review of whether the design meets the proposed thresholds ........... 14 The assessment of freeboard ............................................................. 16 The approach to assessing the effects of scour protection ................. 17 The assessment of the effects of the works on flooding of buildings ... 19 The assessment of debris arrestors ................................................... 20 The peer review ..................................

2. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hart [2012] NZLCDT 20 [pdf, 455 KB]

   ...referred to by Cooper J. In Parlane v New Zealand Law Society (Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee No. 2)4: “The purposes of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act include maintenance of public confidence in the provision of Legal Services, protection of consumers of Legal Services and recognition of the status of the legal profession. To achieve those purposes the Act provides for what is described as “a more responsive regulatory regime in relation to lawyers and conveyancers”...

3. Recommendations Recap - Issue 13 [pdf, 988 KB]

   ...any orders made under section 74 of the Act. 3 Contents Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 4 Adverse Effects or Reactions to Medical/Surgical Care ..................................................... 4 Aviation Accident ............................................................................................................... 4 Fire-related .......................................

4. He Waka Roimata - Transforming our Criminal Justice System [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...increasingly their wāhine) who were removed from their whānau by the criminal justice system. They talked with us about their resulting mamae.3 We commonly heard that this removal was not the first – many also experienced removal as tamariki into state care. 2 Chief (male or female), those of high rank. 3 Hurt and pain. We witnessed grief and anger among people who the system should most protect – those who face significant disadvantage because of their circumstances. This can...

5. McElroy & Ors as Trustees of the Shona and Roger McElroy Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...there is no argument about the fact that Mr Lay was involved with the construction work on this project. The Owners claim that Mr Lay failed to manage or supervise the work properly, which led to the defects, which was in breach of his duty of care owed to subsequent owners of the dwelling. 3.6 The fourth respondent is the company of Jessop Townsend Limited (“JTL”), which the Owners say was the architectural practice that undertook the design work, prepared the drawings fo...

6. Qualitative study on behalf of the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice system reforms [pdf, 943 KB]

   ...................................................................................................................................... 25 4.1 Top of mind experience ................................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Advice to other parents about to embark on parental ‘day-to-day care and contact’ arrangements ...................................................................................................................

7. White v Rodney District Council [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...Gutters • The finishing around the internal downpipe outlets is poorly finished and there is insufficient downturn to provide inadequate and durable seal; Page 13 (d) Roof Parapets • The fibre cement cladding on the internal face has no protective coating to prevent moisture from absorbing and transferring into the timber frame. The sheets have degraded and lost their structural stability. The sheets also have insufficient fastenings and a timber backing does not s...

8. Shepherd & Ors as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...there is no argument about the fact that Mr Lay was involved with the construction work on this project. The Owners claim that Mr Lay failed to manage or supervise the work properly, which led to the defects, which was in breach of his duty of care owed to subsequent owners of the dwelling. 3.6 The fourth respondent is the company of Jessop Townsend Limited (“JTL”), which the Owners say was the architectural practice that undertook the design work, prepared the drawings fo...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 183 Grenadier Ltd v Manawatu-Whanganui Regional Council [pdf, 402 KB]

   ...land disturbance despite it being primarily on private land because it is wāhi tapu and should, according to the Panel, be managed to achieve Ngāti Tukorehe’s objectives”4 and to do so amounts to a “back-door cultural/heritage landscape protection regime 3 Decision of the Independent Hearing Panel at [15.4]. 4 Notice of Appeal at [7]. 6 made up by the Panel in an incomplete manner without any supporting district planning regime created following an RMA, Schedule 1...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 77 Idea Services Ltd v Crozier [pdf, 413 KB]

    ...persons with intellectual disabilities who might pose a danger to themselves, staff caring for them, or others in the community. Many of those persons might well otherwise be in prison, having been convicted of serious offences. They were and are cared for in residential facilities operated by IHC/THL. Most are held under the provisions of the Intellectual Disability (Compulsory Care and Rehabilitation) Act 2003 (IDCC&R Act), although there are others who have high and comple...