RF v CN LCRO 254/2012 (3 November 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]
...dealt with. The amounts in dispute in relation to the other three items are relatively small. 7 Auckland Standards Committee No 3 v Castles [2013] NZLCDT 53 at [177]. 13 [61] Considering carefully the invoices rendered from 9 August 2010 to 6 May 2011, I do not consider that the arguments advanced by Mr RF are sufficiently persuasive to allow me to arrive at a view different to the Committee. It is significant that Mr RF execut...