Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 132 Channel Infrastructure NZ Limited v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   ...regionally significant infrastructure). [10] The parties have agreed a small extension to the mapped MPPZ as shown outlined in red in Annexure A. [11] The parties state the amendment to the pNRP maps to provide a small extension of the MPPZ is carefully designed to include the full extent of the tanker berth pocket (and associated activities) next to the Appellant’s jetty. This is considered as necessary to appropriately provide the Appellant with sufficient operational 2 Pol...

2. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v A Practitioner [2014] NZLCDT 70 [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...be regarded as serious and should be firmly responded to by the Tribunal even in the absence of any dishonesty or lack of probity. (c) Ordering compensation would help mark the seriousness of the practitioner’s negligence and go some way to protecting the consumer client and maintaining confidence in the profession. 5 (d) That although there was more than one cause of the client lender’s losses, the practitioner contributed in a material way to the loss because the i...

3. LCRO 16/2020 PF v VJ (22 September 2020) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...“concerns about Mr VJ’s conduct”. (2) Personal remarks [11] Whilst noting Mr VJ did not act for Mr PF, a third party, the Committee stated Mr VJ was required, pursuant to r 12 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules) to “conduct his dealings” with Mr PF with “integrity respect and courtesy”. [12] However, the Committee decided there was “nothing in the complaint material to suggest” Mr VJ had not treated Mr PF...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 237 Gate Gourmet NZ Ltd and ors v Sandhu and Ors [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...employment agreement are likely to require payment where an employer unilaterally decides an employee is not required to work. While all these obligations are important, none are relevant to the matters currently 11 Faitala v Terranova Homes & Care Ltd [2012] NZEmpC 199, [2012] ERNZ 614 at [19]. 12 Terranova Homes and Care Ltd v Faitala [2013] NZCA 435, [2013] ERNZ 347 at [18]. 13 Karelrybflot AO v Udovenko [2000] 2 NZLR 24 (CA) at [50]. 14 Employment Relations Act 2000, s...

5. [2017] NZEnvC 205 Ahureka Trustees no 2 Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   ...1. A "hamlet" of 186 households and associated non-residential sites, occupying 16.47ha. The non-residential uses include a community hall/building, hotel/bar and restaurant, two retail units and three commercial units; 2. Areas to be protected by covenant, totalling 33.8Sha (of which 12.99ha is existing native vegetation and 20.86ha is proposed revegetation); 3. An area of exotic pine to be retained (O.4ha); 4. A balance area calculated by Ms de Lambert as being 41.S8ha t...

6. 2019 Directory of Official Information P-R [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   Directory of Official Information Listings P-R Author Version number Date About This is a living document; we endeavour to update it whenever there are changes to be made. If your department or agency’s information is out of date, please email official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz with the necessary amendments. official.correspondence@justice.govt.nz Ministerial Services Strategy, Governance & Finance mailto:official.correspond

7. BORA Aquaculture Reform Bill [pdf, 458 KB]

   ...importance. The settlement of such interests will ensure legal certainty for the marine farming sector in New Zealand, allowing it to develop in the future. Rational and proportionate response 34. In assessing the allocation, we have considered carefully the rationality and proportionality of the 20% quantum. While there is no precise science involved in identifying an appropriate share in order to settle interests protected under the Treaty of Waitangi in this context, we consider that...

8. Brown v Otago Polytechnic (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. Apart from references to a range of statutory provisions the defendant is left to guess how it has allegedly breached those provisions. For example the plaintiff does not claim to have made a protected disclosure yet he claims to have been discriminated against under section 66(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1993. He claims the defendant has breached section 21(b)(i) of that Act but does not disclose his marital status nor how tha...

9. LA Audit Report 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 [pdf, 401 KB]

   ...concerns .............................................................................................................17 Private payments .............................................................................................................18 Protecting the Commissioner’s interests ..........................................................................19 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................

10. Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 836 KB]

    ...• People Experience provides human resources support, advice and resources to employees and managers. • Resilience and Assurance Services are responsible for a range of specialist risk management services including; cyber security, privacy, protective security, business continuity, emergency management and disaster recovery. The Deputy Secretary Corporate and Digital Services is also the Chief Information Officer. The General Manager Resilience and Assurance Services is the Minis...