LCRO 53/2020 YJ v GK (22 April 2021) [pdf, 280 KB]
...diverged. It did not “lie in Mr GK’s mouth” to say he could not discharge his duty to ABCD and Mr YJ, because he had discharged, or was in the course of discharging, his duties to Mr DQ. [127] Mr GK is in breach of rule 6, in that he was not ‘protecting and promoting the interests’ of ABCD and Mr YJ. Decision [128] The Standards Committee determined that Mr GK’s conduct “… [fell] short of the standard of competence and diligence that a member of the public is entit...