LCRO 319/2013 RA v ZA (27 June 2017) [pdf, 101 KB]
...delay may pass without note, or be excused. [32] Although Mr RA says his interests were prejudiced, he was successful as plaintiff. He also acknowledges that Ms ZA’s primary obligations were not owed to him. [33] Ms ZA had an obligation to protect, subject to her overriding duties as an officer of the High Court and to her duties under any enactment, the interests of her client. Any obligations she may owe elsewhere, such as conducting her dealings with Mr RA with integrity,...